Skip to main content

Security report for sanitygroup.com

Sanity Group GmbH · Healthcare · Germany

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Sanity Group GmbH is a Berlin-based cannabis company positioned as one of Europe's leading players in the cannabis healthcare sector. The company focuses on unlocking the health benefits of cannabinoids through medical advisory, political advisory, and scientific pilot projects, including cannabis dispensaries in Germany and Switzerland. Their business model integrates medical expertise and regulatory engagement to support cannabis legalization and harm reduction. The website reflects a medium-sized enterprise with a professional online presence, targeting European consumers, healthcare professionals, and policymakers. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with Elementor and Yoast SEO, leveraging modern marketing and tracking tools such as Klaviyo and Google Tag Manager. However, the absence of a valid SSL certificate severely impacts the security posture, despite the presence of several security headers and a privacy-compliant cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the site is content-rich and professionally designed but requires urgent improvements in SSL/TLS configuration to ensure secure communications and trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sanitygroup.com

This scan found 13 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
50
Security headers
70
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
90
GDPR outside view
43
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Sanity Group operates in the healthcare sector with a focus on cannabis-related products and services. Their market positioning as a leading European cannabis company is supported by strategic partnerships and subsidiaries such as vaay, Vayamed, and others. The company benefits from a strong advisory board comprising medical and political experts, enhancing credibility and influence. Their business model includes scientific pilot projects for cannabis dispensaries, aligning with evolving regulatory frameworks in Germany and Europe. Investment from Organigram Holdings signals growth potential and international collaboration. The company targets a diverse audience including medical professionals, regulators, and consumers interested in cannabinoids. The website content and linked domains reflect a well-established partnership ecosystem and a clear growth trajectory.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with several positive indicators such as security headers (X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, X-XSS-Protection, HSTS) and a privacy-compliant cookie consent mechanism. However, the critical absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of HTTPS support significantly undermine the security posture, exposing users to potential interception and trust issues. No evidence of incident response policies, security certifications, or vulnerability disclosure programs was found. The site does not implement advanced TLS protocols or cipher suites, lacks OCSP stapling, and does not fully enable HSTS. These gaps represent medium to high severity risks that could impact business operations and user trust. The company should prioritize SSL/TLS remediation and consider formalizing security policies and incident response capabilities.

Recommendations

  1. Install and maintain a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS and secure user communications.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 or TLS 1.3) and configure strong cipher suites to enhance encryption strength.
  3. Implement full HSTS policy including includeSubDomains and preload to prevent protocol downgrade attacks.
  4. Develop and publish a formal security policy and incident response plan to improve security governance and transparency.
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting and improve security posture.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using the Elementor page builder and Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a modern and flexible content management approach. The site integrates several third-party marketing and analytics tools including Klaviyo, Google Tag Manager, and Usercentrics for cookie consent management. Hosting is provided by Alfahosting as indicated by DNS records. While the site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD), performance metrics were not available. The lack of a valid SSL certificate is a critical technical deficiency. The site uses standard web technologies such as jQuery and modern CSS but could benefit from performance optimization and enhanced accessibility features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sanitygroup.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sanitygroup.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.