Skip to main content

Security report for sandfox.ee

SandFox OÜ · Energy · Estonia

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

40/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SandFox OÜ is a small Estonian company founded in 2016 specializing in integrated energy storage solutions, smart battery management, solar panel integration, and Linux-based IT infrastructure services. The company targets industrial clients and businesses in the energy sector, offering critical IT and industrial automation solutions. Their market position is supported by partnerships with major technology vendors such as RedHat, IBM, Huawei, and SUSE, and they emphasize business-critical IT solutions and energy management. Technically, the website uses a basic but functional stack including jQuery, Google Analytics, and Google Translate, hosted likely by Zone Media OÜ. The site is accessible and moderately optimized but lacks advanced mobile responsiveness and accessibility features. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks important security headers and visible privacy compliance mechanisms. Overall, the company presents a credible and trustworthy business presence with room for improvement in privacy compliance and technical modernization.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sandfox.ee

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
40

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

SandFox OÜ operates in the energy and technology sectors, providing B2B solutions focused on energy storage, industrial automation, and Linux server management. Their competitive advantage lies in combining energy solutions with IT infrastructure expertise, supported by recognized technology partnerships. The business model revolves around delivering tailored industrial and IT services, targeting enterprises requiring reliable energy and server solutions. Growth indicators include trust badges and certifications, though no explicit revenue or size data is available. The company maintains a professional online presence with clear contact information and structured data, facilitating customer engagement and trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, indicating a gap in security transparency. The use of third-party scripts like Google Analytics is standard but requires ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. Compliance with GDPR is not clearly demonstrated due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the security posture is functional but could benefit from enhanced headers, documented policies, and incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add essential security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance web security.
  3. Establish and publicize an incident response contact or security.txt file to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Enhance mobile responsiveness and accessibility to improve user experience and compliance with accessibility standards.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SandFox Llc
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SandFox OÜ
Description
SandFox OÜ provides energy storage and battery solutions, smart battery management, solar panel usage with batteries, comprehensive energy solutions for industry, Linux server management, monitoring solutions, backup solutions, VPN security channels, and industrial automation solutions.
Key services
Energy storage and battery management solutions, Solar panel integration, Linux server installation and maintenance, Monitoring and backup solutions, VPN and network security, Industrial automation and PLC solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.7.1, jQuery UI, Google Analytics, Google Translate, Font Awesome
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Analytics with async loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided in structured data and visible content.
  4. Use of multiple partner logos and trust badges enhances credibility.
  5. Technical stack is basic but functional, relying on jQuery and Google services.
  6. Security headers are missing, which is a notable security improvement area.
  7. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic and could be improved.
  8. No forms detected that collect user data directly on the homepage.
  9. Google Translate integration for language support is present.
  10. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a simple technology stack primarily using jQuery and jQuery UI, with Google Analytics and Google Translate integrated for analytics and multilingual support. The HTML structure is valid but basic, with limited use of modern frameworks or CMS platforms. Hosting appears to be managed by Zone Media OÜ, consistent with the WHOIS data. Performance is moderate, with some optimization opportunities in mobile responsiveness and accessibility. The site lacks advanced SEO features but includes basic meta tags and Open Graph data. Technical debt is low but modernization could improve maintainability and security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sandfox.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sandfox.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.