Skip to main content

Security report for salvere.lv

SIA "Salvere IR" · Healthcare · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA "Salvere IR" is a private medical practice established in 2002, operating for over 20 years with locations in Madona and Cesvaine, Latvia. The company specializes in gynecology, pregnancy care, ultrasonography, and other healthcare services targeting local patients. The website reflects a small but established healthcare provider with a focus on quality and patient care. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including jQuery, Google Analytics, and service workers for PWA capabilities, hosted on a CDN platform. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and cookie consent, but lacks advanced security headers and explicit incident response information. Overall, the site is professional, compliant with GDPR, and trustworthy, though WHOIS data is unavailable for full domain legitimacy verification.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching salvere.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
70
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention salvere.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for salvere.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the healthcare sector, providing specialized medical services primarily in gynecology and related fields. It targets local patients in Latvia, leveraging a private practice model. The company has a stable market position with 20 years of operation and emphasizes professionalism, quality, and patient comfort. Partnerships with local directories and healthcare platforms are evident. Revenue streams likely come from patient visits and specialized medical services. The website supports business credibility with clear contact information and service descriptions.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are provided, limiting transparency in security incident handling. The use of third-party analytics and CDN services introduces potential risks if not regularly audited. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small healthcare provider but could be improved to enhance protection and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve transparency.
  3. Provide explicit incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and analytics tools to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA "Salvere IR"
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA "Salvere IR"
Description
SIA "Salvere IR" izveidota 2002. gadā kā Ligitas Audžes ārsta privātprakse un veiksmīgi strādā jau 20 gadus. Tās struktūrā ir izveidotas divas privātprakses – L.Audžes ārstu prakse Madonā - Madona Rūpniecības iela 20/7-1 un L.Audžes ārstu prakse Cesvainē – Cesvaine Pils iela 1a.
Key services
Ultrasonography, Gynecology, Pregnancy care, Preventive examinations, Neurology, Acupuncture, Psychotherapy, Doppler ultrasound
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.7.0, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Snowplow Analytics, Mapbox, Service Worker for PWA, FontAwesome, CSS3, HTML5
Platforms
Multiscreensite CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Service Worker registered
  • Cookie consent banner present

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Snowplow Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Snowplow Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional healthcare provider site for a private medical practice in Latvia.
  2. Content is well structured with clear navigation and service descriptions.
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are present and compliant with GDPR.
  4. No visible security headers detected; HTTPS is used.
  5. No contact forms detected; contact is via phone and physical addresses.
  6. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error; limits domain trust verification.
  7. Uses multiple external analytics and CDN services.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Multiscreensite CMS platform, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery 3.7.0 and analytics tools including Google Analytics and Snowplow. It employs service workers for offline capabilities and is hosted on a CDN infrastructure ensuring moderate performance. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and uses standard SEO meta tags. However, there is room for improvement in accessibility and security header implementation. The technical stack is appropriate for a small healthcare provider, balancing functionality and maintainability.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with salvere.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review salvere.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.