Skip to main content

Security report for salv.com

Salv · Finance · Finland

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Salv is a Finland-based technology company specializing in financial crime prevention solutions, including AML compliance, fraud detection, and KYC risk scoring. The company offers a modular SaaS platform trusted by over 100 financial institutions across Europe, positioning itself as a key player in the fintech and banking sectors. Salv's platform emphasizes intelligence sharing and automation to enhance the effectiveness of fincrime teams. Technically, the website is built on HubSpot CMS with integrations of modern analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Hotjar, and CookieYes for consent management. The site is hosted behind Cloudflare, ensuring good performance and security. Security posture is strong, with ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type 2 certifications prominently displayed, and best practices like HTTPS enforcement and cookie consent implemented. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Overall, Salv demonstrates a mature digital presence with a professional, user-friendly website that aligns well with its business objectives and compliance requirements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching salv.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention salv.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for salv.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Salv operates in the financial technology sector, focusing on AML and fraud prevention solutions. Its business model is SaaS-based, offering modular tools that allow clients to select services tailored to their needs. The company targets banks, fintechs, payment service providers, and banking-as-a-service providers, indicating a B2B focus. Salv's market position is strong within Europe, supported by a client base of over 100 financial institutions and endorsements from industry leaders. The company leverages partnerships and integrations with major platforms like HubSpot and Cloudflare to enhance its digital capabilities. Revenue streams likely include subscription fees for its platform modules. The presence of a vulnerability disclosure page and security certifications suggests a commitment to trust and transparency, which is critical in the fintech industry.

Security posture

Salv exhibits a high level of security maturity, evidenced by its ISO/IEC 27001:2022 certification and SOC 2 Type 2 compliance. The website enforces HTTPS and employs security best practices such as Content-Security-Policy headers and cookie consent mechanisms. Use of Cloudflare Bot Management cookies indicates proactive bot mitigation. No exposed credentials or vulnerable libraries were identified. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which could be an area for improvement. Incident response contact details are not publicly available, which could be enhanced to improve transparency. Overall, Salv maintains a robust security posture appropriate for its industry and clientele.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve transparency.
  3. Add additional security headers such as HSTS and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  4. Consider providing explicit incident response contact information on the website.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Salv
Description
Smart AML solutions for effective risk mitigation: advanced info sharing, transaction monitoring, KYC risk scoring.
Key services
Salv Screening, Salv Monitoring, Salv Risk Scoring, Salv Bridge (intelligence sharing)
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, HubSpot forms, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Cloudflare, CookieYes consent management
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ISO 27001 and SOC 2 compliance
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data detected
  • Use of Cloudflare Bot Management cookie

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, HubSpot Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Facebook Ads (fb.js), Google Tag Manager
Tracking pixels
Hotjar, HubSpot, Leadfeeder, Leadinfo
Marketing tools
HubSpot forms and analytics, CookieYes consent management
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured
  2. Strong focus on AML and financial crime prevention solutions
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented
  4. Multiple client testimonials and trust signals present
  5. Use of modern analytics and marketing tools
  6. Security certifications prominently displayed
  7. No direct contact emails or phone numbers publicly listed, contact via forms
  8. No terms of service page found
  9. No explicit incident response contact found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using HubSpot CMS, integrating multiple JavaScript libraries and marketing tools including Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, and CookieYes for cookie consent management. Hosting is provided via Cloudflare, ensuring fast loading times and protection against common web threats. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility features. SEO practices are well implemented with appropriate meta tags and Open Graph data. The technical implementation is modern and aligns with industry standards, supporting a positive user experience and strong digital presence. Opportunities exist to enhance DNS security and expand security headers for improved resilience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with salv.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review salv.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.