Skip to main content

Security report for salusansvar.se

Salusansvar · Finance · Sweden

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

33/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SalusAnsvar is a Swedish finance-focused informational website providing comprehensive guides and articles on economy, savings, insurance, pension, and legal aspects related to personal finance. The site targets individuals seeking to improve their financial knowledge and make informed economic decisions. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with a modern theme and uses various third-party services for fonts, analytics, and advertising. It demonstrates good digital maturity with mobile optimization, SEO best practices, and accessibility features. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and implements a robust cookie consent mechanism covering numerous ad and tracking vendors, though it lacks some advanced security headers. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy presence with no critical vulnerabilities detected.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
55/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching salusansvar.se

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
55
Average
33

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention salusansvar.se, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for salusansvar.se right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates as a niche content provider in the finance sector, focusing on personal economy and savings in the Swedish market. Its business model likely relies on advertising and affiliate marketing, as indicated by multiple external links to financial service providers. The site is relatively new, founded in 2024, and targets Swedish-speaking private individuals. It maintains consistent branding and provides expert-written content, enhancing its credibility. The extensive vendor list for advertising and tracking suggests a mature monetization strategy. No parent or subsidiary relationships were identified.

Security posture

The website maintains a good security posture with mandatory HTTPS and no visible exposure of sensitive data. It uses a comprehensive consent management platform to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations. However, it lacks explicit security headers like CSP, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. No vulnerable libraries or insecure forms were detected in the HTML content. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, which is a minor gap in transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement Content Security Policy (CSP) and other security headers to enhance protection against XSS and clickjacking.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Consider adding explicit contact emails and phone numbers for better user support and credibility.
  4. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and vendor integrations to minimize security risks.
  5. Enhance performance optimization to improve loading speed and user experience.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Salusansvar
Description
SalusAnsvar är en guide och informationskälla som erbjuder opartisk och pålitlig kunskap om ekonomi, sparande, försäkringar, pension, juridik och privatekonomi. De publicerar artiklar och ger personliga råd för att hjälpa besökare att fatta välgrundade ekonomiska beslut och bygga en trygg ekonomisk framtid.
Key services
Ekonomiska guider och artiklar, Personliga råd, Information om försäkringar, pension, juridik, Blogg och nyheter
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Google Fonts, Google AdSense, Koko Analytics, GeneratePress theme, GenerateBlocks
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Consent management for cookies and tracking
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Koko Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdSense, VDX.tv, AdMaxim, Index Exchange, Quantcast, BeeswaxIO, Sovrn, Adkernel, Adikteev, RTB House, The UK Trade Desk, Amobee, Epsilon, Yahoo, Adventori, Triple Lift, Xandr, Yieldlab, Roku Advertising Services, PubMatic
Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (implied via Koko Analytics), Koko Analytics
Marketing tools
Koko Analytics, Google Fonts
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based informational blog focused on finance and savings.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent management implemented with detailed vendor list.
  3. No explicit terms of service page found.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; contact via web form only.
  5. Extensive use of third-party ad and tracking vendors.
  6. Good SEO and accessibility practices observed.
  7. No critical security issues detected in HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1 using the GeneratePress theme and GenerateBlocks plugin, indicating a modern and flexible CMS setup. It uses Google Fonts for typography and jQuery for scripting. Analytics are handled via Koko Analytics, a privacy-focused tool. Advertising is managed through Google AdSense and a wide array of third-party ad networks and vendors, integrated with a detailed GDPR-compliant consent management platform. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO metadata and structured data (JSON-LD) for enhanced search engine visibility. Hosting provider details are not explicitly disclosed in the HTML content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with salusansvar.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review salusansvar.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.