Skip to main content

Security report for salnerhof.at

Hotel Salnerhof · Hospitality · Austria

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Hotel Salnerhof is a premium 4-star superior lifestyle resort located in Ischgl, Austria, offering luxury accommodation, wellness, and gourmet dining experiences. The website targets tourists seeking high-end hospitality services in both summer and winter seasons. The business is well-positioned in the hospitality sector with a strong focus on wellness and culinary excellence. Technically, the website is built on TYPO3 CMS with modern JavaScript libraries and includes responsive design and SEO best practices. Security posture is good with HTTPS and no visible vulnerabilities, though security headers and explicit policies could be improved. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear cookie and privacy policies. Overall, the website reflects a professional and trustworthy business with strong digital maturity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching salnerhof.at

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
25
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
68
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The hotel operates in the hospitality industry, focusing on luxury tourism in the Austrian Alps. It leverages partnerships for booking and local services like ski rentals and regional tourist cards. The business model centers on providing premium accommodation combined with wellness and gourmet services, targeting affluent travelers and families. The website content and structure support strong brand positioning and customer engagement through multimedia and multilingual support. Trust indicators such as third-party reviews and social media presence enhance credibility. Growth potential is supported by seasonal offers and event hosting.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS and no exposed sensitive data. Use of Google Tag Manager and Matomo indicates tracking with some privacy considerations. However, the absence of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and security headers suggests room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or malware were detected in the content. The site lacks a published security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure program, which could enhance transparency and trust. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from formalized policies and headers.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page with clear contact channels for security issues.
  3. Introduce a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher compliance standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to ensure no vulnerable libraries are in use.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Hotel Salnerhof
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Hotel Salnerhof
Description
Luxuriöses Wellness-Resort im Chalet-Stil in Ischgl, Tirol, Österreich. Bietet 4 Sterne superior Hotelzimmer, Wellnessbereich, Gourmetküche, Sommer- und Winterurlaubsmöglichkeiten.
Key services
Hotel accommodation, Wellness and spa services, Gourmet restaurant and wine cellar, Summer and winter holiday packages, Event hosting
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
TYPO3 CMS, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Plyr (YouTube video player), Owl Carousel
Frameworks
TYPO3
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo (via mpc-widget.js), Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Content is comprehensive and relevant to the hospitality industry.
  3. Multiple language options available (German and English).
  4. Strong presence of trust signals including reviews and social media links.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and CMS (TYPO3).
  6. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented.
  7. No signs of security blocking or WAF challenges.
  8. No explicit security policy or incident response information publicly available.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses TYPO3 CMS, a robust and scalable content management system suitable for enterprise-level hospitality websites. It employs modern JavaScript libraries like jQuery and Owl Carousel for interactive elements and Plyr for video playback. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing tags, alongside Matomo for privacy-focused analytics. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and preloads fonts for performance. While performance is moderate, there is potential for optimization in loading times and accessibility. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, supporting a professional online presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with salnerhof.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review salnerhof.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.