The website www.sallijasblogs.lv represents a small Latvian alternative healing and bioenergetics service provider led by Ilona Ozola. The business offers a range of spiritual and energy healing services including energetic diagnostics, chakra and meridian balancing, psychological coding, numerology, and tarot reading. The site targets Latvian-speaking individuals interested in non-traditional medicine and spiritual guidance. Technically, the site is built on the Multiscreensite platform, using modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Google Analytics for tracking. The site is mobile optimized and includes a contact form with captcha for user inquiries. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers. Privacy and cookie policies are present and indicate GDPR compliance. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain registration verification. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy within its niche but could improve security practices and transparency.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
GDPR outside view
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
Critical
EU business without adequate privacy measures
EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures
High
No Privacy Policy found
GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently
This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
70
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
65
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention sallijasblogs.lv, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for sallijasblogs.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
The business operates in the niche energy and alternative medicine sector in Latvia, focusing on personalized healing sessions both in-person and remotely. The business model is service-based with direct client engagement via consultations and healing sessions. The website content and structure suggest a well-established practitioner with a local reputation. The presence of testimonials and detailed service descriptions supports credibility. The partnership with the Latvian web development company indicates professional site maintenance. Growth potential exists in expanding remote services and digital marketing. No evidence of large-scale operations or subsidiaries was found.
Security posture
The website employs HTTPS and uses captcha on its contact form, which are positive security measures. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of third-party analytics and tracking scripts is standard but requires ongoing monitoring for library updates. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are not present, which is a gap in security transparency. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but can be enhanced with additional headers and policies.
Recommendations
Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to improve protection against common web attacks.
Publish an incident response and vulnerability disclosure policy to enhance transparency and readiness.
Regularly update all third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.
Maintain and update privacy and cookie policies to ensure ongoing GDPR compliance.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Company
Sallija sertificēta dziedniece
Description
Ilona Ozola dziedniece, bioenerģētika. Specializācija - enerģētiskā diagnostika, čakru meridiānu balans, psiholoģiskā kodēšana uz veiksmi, veco programmu dzēšana, numerologija, tarologija.
Key services
Enerģētiskā diagnostika, Čakru un meridiānu balanss, Psiholoģiskā kodēšana, Numeroloģija, Taroloģija, Dziedināšanas sesijas klātienē un attālināti, Biolauka korekcija, Dzīvokļa/mājas enerģijas attīrīšana
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent
Technology
Stack
jQuery 3.7.0, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Snowplow Analytics, Service Worker, FontAwesome, Nunito, DM Sans, Montserrat fonts, Multiscreensite platform
Platforms
Multiscreensite CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good
Security
Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
HTTPS enforced
Use of service worker for PWA
Captcha on contact form
Analytics and tracking
Services
Google Analytics, Snowplow Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good
Advertising
Tracking pixels
Snowplow
Transparency
basic
Site quality
Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate
Key observations
Website is fully accessible with rich content in Latvian language.
Focuses on alternative medicine and spiritual healing services.
Includes contact form with captcha for user inquiries.
Privacy and cookie policies are present and compliant.
No evident security headers detected; HTTPS is used.
WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Uses multiple analytics and tracking services.
Site built on Multiscreensite platform with modern JS libraries.
Technical notes
Notes
The website is built on the Multiscreensite CMS platform, leveraging modern web technologies such as jQuery 3.7.0, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Snowplow Analytics. It uses service workers to enable PWA features and loads multiple web fonts for styling. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and includes SEO-friendly meta tags and Open Graph tags. Performance is moderate with asynchronous script loading and CSS preloading. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected. Hosting provider details are not explicitly available from the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a stable and user-friendly experience but could benefit from enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with sallijasblogs.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sallijasblogs.lv.