Skip to main content

Security report for salemove.com

Glia · Finance · United States

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

79/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Glia, Inc. is a technology company specializing in AI-powered contact center software solutions designed to enhance customer experience across digital and voice channels. Positioned primarily in the finance sector, Glia offers a unified platform that automates and assists customer interactions, targeting enterprises seeking to modernize their customer service operations. The company maintains a professional and well-branded online presence with comprehensive content and clear navigation, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Technically, the website leverages modern web technologies including Webflow CMS, Google Fonts, Marketo for marketing automation, Facebook Pixel for advertising, and Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site is hosted on Webflow's platform, optimized for mobile devices, and implements good SEO and accessibility practices. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in loading speed. From a security perspective, the website enforces HTTPS with strong SSL configuration and includes multiple security headers, indicating a solid security posture. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, the absence of a public security policy and incident response contact information suggests areas for enhancement in transparency and readiness. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR requirements. Overall, Glia presents a trustworthy and professional digital footprint with minor gaps in WHOIS transparency and explicit security disclosures. Strategic improvements in these areas would further strengthen business credibility and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching salemove.com

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
55
Email security
68
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
79

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Glia operates in the competitive AI contact center software market, focusing on financial institutions and enterprises requiring advanced customer engagement solutions. Its business model is B2B SaaS, generating revenue through software subscriptions and service agreements. The company differentiates itself through AI-driven automation and unified digital-voice interaction capabilities. Partnerships and integrations with marketing and analytics platforms enhance its ecosystem. Growth indicators include a comprehensive product suite and targeted use cases. The company maintains a consistent brand and professional content, supporting its market positioning as an innovative technology provider.

Security posture

Glia demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, robust SSL configuration, and implementation of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options. The website avoids exposing sensitive data and uses secure forms for data collection. However, the lack of a dedicated security policy page and absence of incident response contact details limit transparency and may affect stakeholder confidence. No public vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file was found, which could be improved to encourage responsible vulnerability reporting. Overall, the security measures are strong but could benefit from enhanced communication and formalized incident response processes.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and compliance.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information, including security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance website accessibility by adding ARIA landmarks and roles for improved usability.
  5. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and marketing tools to mitigate potential security risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Glia, Inc.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Glia
Description
Glia provides AI-powered contact center software solutions that automate, assist, and analyze customer interactions across digital and voice channels with a unified platform.
Key services
AI Contact Center Software, Digital and Voice Interaction Automation, Customer Experience Enhancement
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, Google Fonts (Roboto), Marketo Munchkin, Facebook Pixel, Google Tag Manager, GSAP, Swiper.js, Intellimize
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with proper input fields

Analytics and tracking

Services
Marketo Munchkin, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Marketo Munchkin
Marketing tools
Marketo, Intellimize
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. No WAF or security challenge detected.
  3. WHOIS data is missing or domain is unregistered under the queried name, which is unusual.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response contact found.
  6. Multiple marketing and analytics tools are integrated.
  7. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities detected in HTML content.
  8. Contact information is available via forms and emails on contact page.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack with Webflow CMS, leveraging popular libraries such as GSAP for animations and Swiper.js for sliders. Marketing and analytics integrations include Marketo, Facebook Pixel, and Google Tag Manager, supporting data-driven marketing efforts. Hosting on Webflow provides reliable infrastructure but performance is moderate, suggesting optimization opportunities. The site is mobile-optimized with good accessibility features and SEO meta tags. Technical debt appears low, though continuous monitoring of third-party dependencies is recommended to maintain security and performance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with salemove.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review salemove.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.