Skip to main content

Security report for rvk.ch

RVK · Healthcare · Switzerland

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

RVK is an independent and leading service provider in the Swiss healthcare market, offering specialized services including risk and performance management, insurance medicine consulting, and education through its RVK Academy. The company targets insurers, pension funds, and enterprises, providing tailored insurance and educational solutions. The website is professionally designed, consistent in branding, and provides clear contact information and trust signals such as client testimonials and SQS-Audit certification. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies like Swiper.js and Google Maps API, with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced, but lacks explicit security headers and formal security policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies and no consent mechanism. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the business claims, indicating legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rvk.ch

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
68
Average
53
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention rvk.ch, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for rvk.ch right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

RVK operates as a specialized service provider in the Swiss healthcare sector, focusing on risk management, insurance consulting, and professional education. Its business model revolves around providing value-added services to insurers, pension funds, and healthcare providers, leveraging integrated care models and collective purchasing to optimize costs and quality. The company maintains a medium-sized presence with a clear market position as an independent leader. Partnerships and client testimonials indicate a strong ecosystem and customer trust. The website content and structure support a professional image and facilitate user engagement with clear navigation and service offerings.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure policy, and no security.txt file was found. The absence of cookie consent mechanisms and privacy policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. Overall, while no critical vulnerabilities are evident, improvements in security headers, privacy compliance, and formal security policies are advised to enhance the security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with visible links on the website.
  2. Add a cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and user privacy expectations.
  3. Deploy security headers such as CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Establish and publish an incident response and vulnerability disclosure policy, including a security.txt file.
  5. Complete Google Analytics setup with proper UA code and review data collection practices for privacy compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
RVK
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
RVK
Description
RVK entlastet Versicherer, Pensionskassen und Unternehmen mit spezialisierten Dienstleistungen sowie massgeschneiderten Versicherungs- und Bildungsangeboten.
Key services
Risk and performance management, Insurance medicine consulting, Education and training (RVK Academy), Integrated care models, Collective purchasing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Swiper.js (carousel), Google Maps API
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (UA not set)
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented in German language targeting Swiss healthcare market.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found on the main page or indicated in scripts.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided via JSON-LD and navigation links.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and structured data enhances SEO and usability.
  6. Security headers and explicit security policies are missing or not detected.
  7. Google Analytics is included but UA code is empty, indicating possible incomplete setup.
  8. No forms detected in the provided HTML snippet; contact likely via email or external portals.
  9. Social media presence includes LinkedIn and Facebook sharing links.
  10. SQS-Audit certification mentioned, indicating quality management compliance.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using standard modern web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript with Swiper.js for interactive carousels and Google Maps API integration. The site is mobile optimized and uses structured data (JSON-LD) for enhanced SEO and rich snippets. Performance is moderate with lazy loading images and responsive design. No CMS or hosting provider details were detected from the HTML. The absence of broken elements and clear navigation contributes to a positive user experience. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility features and optimize security configurations to reduce technical risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rvk.ch. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rvk.ch.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.