Russell Stover · Retail · United States
Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.
Russell Stover is a well-established chocolate and candy brand operating a professional e-commerce website offering a wide range of products including traditional chocolates, gift baskets, and sugar-free options. The website targets consumers seeking quality confectionery gifts and personalized chocolate boxes. The business operates under the retail and e-commerce sectors and is a subsidiary of Lindt & Sprüngli, a globally recognized chocolate manufacturer. The website demonstrates consistent branding and good content quality, supporting its market position as a trusted chocolate retailer. Technically, the website is built on Magento Commerce with modern JavaScript frameworks and integrates multiple analytics and marketing platforms such as Google Tag Manager, Adobe Experience Cloud, and New Relic for performance monitoring. The site is mobile-optimized and employs standard SEO and accessibility practices, although accessibility could be improved further. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. From a security perspective, the website enforces HTTPS, uses standard security headers, and employs CAPTCHA on forms to mitigate automated abuse. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, the absence of a publicly available security policy and incident response contact information suggests areas for improvement in transparency and readiness. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms, aligning with GDPR requirements. Overall, the website presents a low-risk profile with strong business credibility and technical maturity. The main risk factor is the lack of WHOIS data, which may be due to privacy protection or query limitations but warrants monitoring. Strategic recommendations include publishing a security policy, enhancing incident response visibility, and improving accessibility compliance to further strengthen trust and security posture.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
Controls resources the browser is allowed to load
What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit
TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.
Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention russellstover.com, from OffSeq Breach.
2 subdomains affected
See the 10 newest leaked credentials
A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for russellstover.com.
Select it in the checkout above.
Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with russellstover.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review russellstover.com.