Skip to main content

Security report for runway.com

Runway · Finance · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Runway operates as a modern SaaS finance platform focused on collaborative planning, intuitive modeling, and reporting for finance and data-driven teams. The company positions itself as a user-friendly alternative in the financial planning software market, supported by strong customer testimonials and industry recognition such as G2 badges. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation and mobile optimization, reflecting a mature digital presence. Technically, the site leverages Webflow CMS, Cloudflare DNS, and integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and HubSpot, indicating a sophisticated marketing infrastructure. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enabled and domain protections in place, but lacks visible security headers and formal security policies on the site. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of explicit privacy and cookie policies, which poses a risk for GDPR and other regulations. Overall, the domain is legitimate with a long history and consistent registration data. Strategic improvements in privacy disclosures and security best practices would enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching runway.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Runway targets finance teams and businesses seeking streamlined financial planning solutions, operating in the finance and technology sectors. Its SaaS model focuses on collaborative and intuitive financial tools, positioning it competitively with a focus on ease of use and data-driven decision making. The company demonstrates strong market presence through customer stories and G2 recognition, indicating positive user reception and leadership in budgeting and forecasting. The integration with partner domains such as docs.runway.com and app.runway.com supports a comprehensive service ecosystem. Marketing efforts are robust, utilizing multiple analytics and retargeting platforms to engage users. The absence of explicit contact details and privacy policies suggests areas for operational transparency improvement.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL configuration and domain registration protections such as clientTransferProhibited status. However, it lacks DNSSEC and does not publish common security headers, which could expose it to certain web-based attacks. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are provided, limiting transparency in security management. The use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing scripts increases the attack surface and data privacy risks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing security headers, DNSSEC, and publishing formal security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  3. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and incident response readiness.
  5. Provide clear contact information including security and support emails to enhance trust and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Runway
Description
Runway is the modern and intuitive way to model, plan, and align your business for everyone on your team.
Key services
Collaborative Planning, Intuitive Modeling, Reporting
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Webflow, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Intellimize, Finsweet FS Components
Frameworks
Webflow CMS
Platforms
Cloudflare (DNS and likely CDN)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited and clientUpdateProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, HubSpot Analytics, Facebook Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Facebook Ads, Twitter Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, HubSpot Analytics
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Intellimize
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well structured.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found in the provided content.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content.
  4. Strong use of marketing and analytics tools indicating data collection but lacking visible privacy compliance disclosures.
  5. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy.
  6. WHOIS data indicates a mature and legitimate domain.
  7. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Webflow CMS and hosted with Cloudflare DNS services, leveraging modern JavaScript frameworks and marketing technologies such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Intellimize for optimization. The site demonstrates good mobile responsiveness and accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with multiple external scripts that could impact load times. The technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy compliance mechanisms. The use of dynamic script loading and module preloading indicates a modern front-end architecture. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable web presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with runway.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review runway.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.