Skip to main content

Security report for rumpold.cz

Rumpold · Energy · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Network security.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Rumpold.cz is a Czech Republic based company operating in the energy sector, likely specializing in waste management and related services. The website is professionally designed with good technical infrastructure, including modern JavaScript libraries and cookie consent management via Cookiebot. The domain is well-established, registered since 1998, and hosted on Forpsi servers. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled and use of Google Tag Manager, but lacks visible security headers and explicit privacy or terms policies. Contact information is not explicitly found in the provided content, which may impact user trust and compliance. Overall, the website is functional and professional but could improve privacy compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rumpold.cz

This scan found 10 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
80
Email security
100
DNS health
90
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention rumpold.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for rumpold.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company appears to be an established service provider in the energy and waste management sector in the Czech Republic. The business model focuses on providing services to local businesses and municipalities. The website targets Czech-speaking audiences and uses modern web technologies to deliver content. The lack of explicit contact details and privacy policies suggests room for improvement in customer engagement and regulatory compliance. The domain age and hosting provider indicate a stable operational history. No suspicious domains or partners were identified.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS and implements cookie consent mechanisms, which are positive security practices. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are published. The site does not expose sensitive data or use vulnerable libraries based on the provided content. Security score is moderate, but improvements are recommended to enhance protection and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement and configure security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, HSTS) to strengthen security posture.
  3. Add explicit contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer and security inquiries.
  4. Establish and publish an incident response and vulnerability disclosure policy to demonstrate security maturity.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to avoid vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Rumpold
Description
Rumpold is a company operating in the energy sector, likely providing waste management and related services in the Czech Republic.
Key services
waste management, energy services, consulting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Video.js, Flickity, Cookiebot, Google Tag Manager
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by https URL)
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented via Cookiebot
  • Google Tag Manager used with conditional loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is in Czech language targeting local audience.
  2. Cookie consent is implemented via Cookiebot with asynchronous loading.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found in the provided HTML content.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided content.
  5. Use of modern JavaScript libraries for video and carousel functionality.
  6. No visible security headers or advanced security policies detected in HTML content.
  7. No visible forms or form fields detected in the truncated HTML content.
  8. No social media links explicitly found in the provided content.
  9. Website uses HTTPS and external trusted services like Google Tag Manager.
  10. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript stack including Video.js for video playback and Flickity for carousel functionality. Cookie consent is managed asynchronously via Cookiebot. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking, loaded conditionally based on user consent. The site is hosted on Forpsi servers, a known Czech hosting provider. The HTML structure is responsive and includes accessibility features. Performance is moderate with asynchronous script loading. No CMS or major frameworks detected explicitly. The site could benefit from enhanced SEO metadata and structured data for better search engine visibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rumpold.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rumpold.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.