Skip to main content

Security report for rulematch.com

RULEMATCH AG · Finance · Switzerland

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

RULEMATCH AG operates a specialized spot cryptocurrency trading venue based in Switzerland, leveraging Nasdaq technology to serve banks, securities firms, and institutional clients. The company positions itself as a market operator focused on interbank trading and settlement of digital assets, emphasizing market integrity, AML/CFT compliance, and ultra-low latency trading. The website reflects a professional and modern digital presence with comprehensive trading documentation and news insights, targeting a niche institutional audience. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern SEO and privacy compliance tools, including Iubenda for cookie and privacy management, and Google Tag Manager for analytics. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and obfuscated contact details, though explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not publicly disclosed. WHOIS data is unavailable, which slightly impacts trust but is mitigated by the presence of regulatory identifiers and professional content. Overall, RULEMATCH demonstrates a mature digital infrastructure suitable for its specialized financial services market.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rulematch.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
55
Email security
70
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention rulematch.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1
Employees
0
Customers
1
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for rulematch.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets a highly regulated financial sector, offering a Nasdaq-powered crypto trading platform that ensures market integrity and compliance with AML/CFT regulations. Its business model revolves around providing a secure, efficient, and ultra-low latency trading environment for institutional participants. Partnerships with technology providers like Talos and Market Synergy indicate a growing ecosystem and integration capabilities. The presence of LEI, D-U-N-S, and VAT numbers enhances corporate transparency. The website's content and structure support a strong brand identity and trustworthiness, with active social media channels for engagement. The lack of WHOIS data suggests either recent domain registration or privacy protection, which should be monitored for legitimacy assurance.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and employs cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR, indicating good privacy compliance. Contact emails are obfuscated to prevent spam. However, the absence of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and security.txt files limits transparency on vulnerability management and incident handling. No security headers were detected in the provided data, suggesting room for improvement in HTTP security configurations. The use of third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager and Iubenda is standard but requires ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by publishing clear security policies and improving HTTP header configurations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  2. Add and enforce security HTTP headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
RULEMATCH AG
Registration number
CHE-364.523.851
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
RULEMATCH AG
Description
RULEMATCH is a spot crypto trading venue based in Switzerland, built with Nasdaq technology - for financial institutions only.
Key services
Spot crypto trading venue, Multilateral net settlement, Trade reporting, Institutional access via FIX and Nasdaq ITCH/OUCH protocols
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, Google Tag Manager, Iubenda Cookie Solution, jQuery, LazySizes (lazy loading images), Bootstrap (implied by navbar classes)
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls
  • Email addresses obfuscated with JavaScript encoding

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Iubenda Cookie Law Solution
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Professional and modern design with clear navigation and good SEO.
  3. Strong focus on institutional crypto trading with Nasdaq technology.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies implemented with user consent mechanisms.
  5. Contact information is present and obfuscated for spam protection.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response contacts found.
  7. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual but not necessarily suspicious.
  8. Social media presence on Twitter and LinkedIn supports legitimacy.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS, utilizing Yoast SEO for search optimization and Iubenda for privacy and cookie compliance. It integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking. The site employs lazy loading for images to improve performance and uses Bootstrap-based responsive design for mobile optimization. The technical implementation is modern and aligns with best practices for content delivery and user experience. However, no hosting provider information was detected, and security headers are missing, which could be a technical risk. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness and SEO optimization. The site could benefit from enhanced accessibility and security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rulematch.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rulematch.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.