Skip to main content

Security report for rudolfuvpramen.cz

BHMW a.s. · Hospitality · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website rudolfuvpramen.cz represents BHMW a.s., a small hospitality business operating the Mariánskolazaňský Rudolfův pramen, a healing spring in Mariánské Lázně, Czech Republic. The site provides information about the spring's healing properties, targeting general audiences interested in wellness and spa treatments. The business appears to have a local/regional market position with a focus on health and wellness services. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Divi theme, incorporating common plugins such as Google Analytics for tracking and Tawk.to for live chat support. The site is moderately optimized for mobile and SEO, with good content quality and consistent branding. Security-wise, HTTPS is enabled and no sensitive data is exposed, but the absence of security headers and privacy/cookie policies indicates room for improvement in compliance and security posture. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but lacks some critical compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rudolfuvpramen.cz

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

BHMW a.s. operates in the hospitality sector, specifically in spa and wellness services centered around a natural healing spring. The business model is service-oriented, focusing on health benefits from mineral-rich water for drinking and bathing. The company targets wellness tourists and local visitors seeking therapeutic treatments. The website's presence since 2014 aligns with the domain age, indicating stable operations. The use of social media (Facebook) and Google Analytics suggests engagement with digital marketing and user analytics. No evidence of subsidiaries or parent companies was found. The business maintains a consistent brand image and provides clear service descriptions, supporting moderate market credibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture. HTTPS is properly configured, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No privacy or cookie policies are present, which is a compliance risk under GDPR and similar regulations. The site uses third-party scripts for analytics and live chat, which should be regularly audited for vulnerabilities. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, limiting transparency in security management. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small business but requires enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with explicit user consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) at the server level to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Establish and disclose an incident response process and provide contact channels for security issues (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email addresses).
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities and reduce attack surface.
  5. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to foster transparency and responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
BHMW a.s.
Description
The basic healing spring of Mariánské Lázně used for drinking and bathing procedures. With a high content of iron and calcium ions.
Key services
drinking procedures, bathing procedures
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Divi Theme, jQuery, Google Analytics, Tawk.to live chat, Soundy Background Music plugin
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Analytics with consent
  • Use of live chat with secure scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Tawk.to live chat
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress site using Divi theme with standard plugins.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact information limited to phone number in structured data; no email or physical address found.
  4. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy present.
  5. Use of Google Analytics and Tawk.to live chat indicates moderate user tracking.
  6. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  7. Good SEO metadata and structured data present.
  8. No visible forms collecting personal data on the main page.
  9. No security headers detected in HTML content; likely configured at server level but not visible here.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern CMS platform (WordPress) with the Divi theme, which provides flexibility and ease of content management. The tech stack includes jQuery and several plugins for enhanced user experience such as live chat and background music. Google Fonts and Google Analytics are used for typography and analytics respectively. The site is hosted likely by Wedos, a known Czech hosting provider, consistent with the registrar information. Performance is moderate, with some optimization possible. Mobile responsiveness is good, but accessibility features are basic. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Technical debt appears low, but the absence of security headers and compliance documentation indicates areas for modernization and risk reduction.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rudolfuvpramen.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rudolfuvpramen.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.