Skip to main content

Security report for rubyfortune.com

Baytree Interactive Ltd · Hospitality · Guernsey

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ruby Fortune Casino, operated by Baytree Interactive Ltd, is a well-established online casino platform offering a premium gaming experience with over 450 games including slots, table games, and live dealer options. The business targets online casino players seeking luxury and trustworthy gaming with strong licensing and certifications such as eCOGRA and the Kahnawake Gaming Commission. The website is professionally designed, mobile optimized, and provides comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent management. Technically, it uses modern JavaScript libraries and analytics tools, though no explicit CMS or hosting provider is identified. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, but lacks explicit security headers and incident response information. WHOIS data is missing, which reduces trust slightly and warrants further verification. Overall, the site is credible and professional but would benefit from enhanced transparency on domain registration and security policies.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rubyfortune.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the hospitality sector focusing on online gambling. It has a medium-sized footprint with a history dating back to 2003. Revenue streams likely include player deposits, bonuses, and affiliate partnerships. The affiliate program with Buffalo Partners and certifications from eCOGRA and Kahnawake reinforce market credibility. The target audience is global online casino players, with localized language options and mobile accessibility. The business model is based on premium casino entertainment with a focus on trust and security. Strategic partnerships and licensing support regulatory compliance and market positioning. Growth indicators include mobile platform development and extensive game offerings.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR. Certifications such as eCOGRA and Kahnawake licensing indicate regulatory compliance and fair play. However, the absence of visible security headers and lack of published incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies represent gaps. No direct contact emails or phone numbers for security or support are found, which may impact incident handling. The use of third-party scripts and analytics is standard but should be regularly audited. Overall, the security culture appears professional but could improve transparency and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page including contact channels for security issues to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Create and maintain a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet recognized standards and improve user experience for all users.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and analytics tools to mitigate risks from external dependencies.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Baytree Interactive Ltd
Registration number
69691
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Baytree Interactive Ltd
Description
Ruby Fortune Casino offers premium online casino entertainment with over 450 casino games including slots, blackjack, roulette, poker, and live dealer games. It targets players seeking a luxurious and trustworthy gaming experience with bonuses and mobile accessibility.
Key services
Casino games, Mobile casino, Live dealer games, Banking services, Customer support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, jQuery 3.6.0, Swiper.js, ePrivacy plugin
Platforms
Web, Mobile (responsive design)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with management options
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure cookies with SameSite and Secure flags

Analytics and tracking

Services
vtrk analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
digitrk
Tracking pixels
vtrk analytics
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and warrants caution.
  3. Strong presence of trust indicators such as eCOGRA certification and Kahnawake license.
  4. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent management implemented.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; support is via Help Centre link.
  6. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and analytics tools.
  7. Mobile optimized with responsive design and good user experience.
  8. No explicit security headers detected in HTML source; recommend header audit.
  9. No visible forms collecting personal data on homepage; registration and login handled on separate auth subdomain.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript stack including jQuery 3.6.0, Swiper.js for UI components, and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile responsive with good design quality and navigation clarity. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Performance is moderate with asynchronous script loading and deferred resources. Accessibility is basic and could be improved. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. The absence of security headers and WHOIS data are technical risks. Overall, the infrastructure supports a professional online casino experience but has room for modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rubyfortune.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rubyfortune.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.