Skip to main content

Security report for rtdoc.tv

Privacy protection service - whoisproxy.ru · Media · Russia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

RT.DOC is a Russian-based online streaming platform specializing in documentary films and series from around the world. Launched in 2024, it offers free access to high-quality documentary content covering history, culture, science, sports, and politics. The platform supports user registration for personalized features such as watchlists and ratings, and provides multi-language support including Russian, English, and Chinese. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies including video.js for streaming, service workers for PWA capabilities, and Swiper.js for interactive UI elements. The site is hosted under a Russian registrar with privacy-protected WHOIS data, consistent with its regional focus.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rtdoc.tv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
53
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The platform targets documentary enthusiasts and general audiences interested in educational and cultural content. Its business model appears to be free streaming with user accounts to enhance engagement. The market position is niche within the media streaming sector, focusing on documentary films rather than general entertainment. The use of privacy protection in domain registration is standard for media businesses. Tracking via Yandex and Mail.ru indicates regional marketing and analytics focus. The platform's recent launch suggests growth potential in the Russian-speaking market and possibly internationally via its English and Chinese versions.

Security posture

RT.DOC demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protection in place. However, it lacks DNSSEC and explicit security headers in the HTML response, which are recommended best practices. No public security or incident response policies were found, and no vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present. The site uses modern web technologies securely but could improve transparency and technical security controls. User data collection is present via forms but no advanced privacy compliance mechanisms like cookie consent banners were detected.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to improve domain name system security.
  2. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information.
  4. Add a cookie consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Privacy protection service - whoisproxy.ru
Description
Онлайн кинотеатр документального кино и сериалов со всей планеты! Смотрите фильмы бесплатно в хорошем качестве в любом месте и в любое время. Лучшие работы документалистов по истории и культуре, о путешествиях и науке, а также спорте и политике.
Key services
streaming documentary films, collections and series, live broadcasts, user accounts with watchlists and ratings
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, video.js, service workers, PWA, Swiper.js
Platforms
Web, Progressive Web App
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • clientTransferProhibited domain status
  • service worker registered for PWA

Analytics and tracking

Services
Yandex Metrika, Mail.ru
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
mail.ru, yandex
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a Russian-language documentary streaming platform launched recently in 2024.
  2. Content is accessible and well structured with rich metadata and video streaming capabilities.
  3. No WAF or blocking detected; site uses HTTPS and modern web technologies including PWA and service workers.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present but lack explicit consent mechanisms.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies found publicly.
  6. WHOIS data shows privacy protection but consistent with business location and domain age.
  7. Tracking scripts from Yandex and Mail.ru present indicating moderate user tracking.
  8. No adult or questionable content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack with video.js for media playback, service workers for PWA functionality, and Swiper.js for UI sliders. It is mobile optimized and SEO friendly with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Hosting is via RU-CENTER with DNS servers from megafon.ru. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional streaming service but has room for security and performance enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rtdoc.tv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rtdoc.tv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.