Skip to main content

Security report for rt.eu

RT TORAX, s.r.o. · Real Estate · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

RT TORAX, s.r.o. is a Czech Republic-based company operating primarily in the real estate development and automotive sectors. Their website highlights various real estate projects including residential and commercial properties, alongside automotive sales and leasing services. The company appears to target regional customers interested in property investment and automotive purchases or leasing. The business model combines property development with automotive retail and financial services, positioning RT TORAX as a medium-sized regional player with a diversified portfolio. Technically, the website is built with standard HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, utilizing Google Fonts for typography. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile use but lacks advanced technical frameworks or CMS platforms. There is no evidence of analytics or tracking technologies, and the site does not implement modern security headers or privacy mechanisms. The absence of privacy and cookie policies, as well as contact information, limits the site's compliance posture. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS (assumed from URL scheme) but lacks visible security headers and incident response contacts. The WHOIS data is unavailable due to privacy protection or query failure, which reduces transparency and trustworthiness. No forms or data collection points are present, minimizing immediate data exposure risks but also limiting user engagement. Overall, the security posture is basic with room for improvement in compliance and transparency. The overall risk assessment indicates a moderately trustworthy business website with limited security and privacy features. Strategic recommendations include implementing comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, enhancing security headers, publishing contact and incident response information, and improving WHOIS transparency where possible to build greater trust with users and partners.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rt.eu

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
20
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

RT TORAX, s.r.o. operates in the real estate and automotive sectors within the Czech Republic, focusing on property development projects and automotive sales and leasing. The company leverages a diversified business model combining real estate assets with automotive retail and financial services. Market positioning appears regional with a focus on local investors and customers. The website references partnerships or related domains such as Ostrava Towers and rt-torax.cz, indicating a networked ecosystem. Revenue streams likely include property sales, leasing income, automotive sales, and leasing fees. The absence of detailed business disclosures or certifications limits deeper financial or operational insights. Growth indicators are not explicit but the presence of multiple real estate projects suggests active development. The company could benefit from enhanced digital presence and transparency to strengthen competitive advantage.

Security posture

The current security maturity level of the website is basic. The site uses HTTPS but lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options. No privacy or cookie policies are published, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. There is no visible incident response or security contact information, reducing readiness for security events. No forms or user input fields are present, minimizing attack surface but also limiting user interaction. The WHOIS data is unavailable, which reduces domain transparency and trust. No analytics or tracking scripts are detected, which limits privacy concerns but also reduces business intelligence capabilities. Overall, the security culture appears minimal and would benefit from structured policies, transparency, and technical hardening.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Provide clear contact information including security incident response contacts to improve trust and readiness.
  4. Improve WHOIS transparency if possible or provide business verification to enhance legitimacy perception.
  5. Consider integrating analytics with privacy-respecting configurations to gain business insights while maintaining user privacy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
RT TORAX, s.r.o.
Description
RT TORAX, s.r.o. is a company engaged primarily in real estate development and automotive sales and services. Their portfolio includes residential and commercial real estate projects such as the Ostrava Towers Complex and various office and residential buildings. They also offer automotive services including new and used cars, leasing, financing, and related services.
Key services
Real estate development, Real estate sales and leasing, Automotive sales (new and used vehicles), Automotive leasing and financing, Automotive related services
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google Fonts (Montserrat)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable, indicating privacy protection or query failure.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on the main page.
  5. Website content is minimal but relevant to real estate and automotive sectors.
  6. No social media links or security incident contacts detected.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  8. No security headers or advanced security features detected.
  9. Site uses Google Fonts and basic JavaScript for UI effects.
  10. No forms or data collection elements present on the main page.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, with Google Fonts for typography. There is no evidence of a CMS or advanced frameworks. The site uses basic JavaScript for UI effects such as image hover transitions. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization techniques detected. Mobile optimization is basic but functional. Accessibility features are minimal. SEO optimization is basic with meta viewport and charset tags but no Open Graph or structured data present. Hosting provider and infrastructure details are not disclosed. The lack of security headers and privacy policies indicates technical debt in security and compliance areas. Modernization opportunities include adopting a CMS or framework for easier content management, implementing security best practices, and enhancing SEO and accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rt.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rt.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.