Skip to main content

Security report for rsga.lv

SIA RSGA · Real Estate · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA RSGA is a Latvian company specializing in full-cycle waste landfill reclamation and complex earthworks, with over 15 years of industry experience. Their services include sand sales, hydroseeding, earthworks, alternative daily covering, industrial deodorants, dustproofing, and business development services targeted primarily at B2B clients in construction and waste management sectors. The website reflects a stable local market presence with professional content and client testimonials. Technically, the site uses standard web technologies such as jQuery and Google Analytics, with a cookie consent mechanism in place, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Security posture is moderate with no visible critical vulnerabilities, though security headers and SSL details require verification. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professionally maintained, supporting the company's business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rsga.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the real estate and transportation sectors, focusing on environmental and construction services related to waste management. Their business model revolves around providing specialized services to waste management facilities and construction projects, leveraging long-term client relationships and a portfolio of key services. The presence of client testimonials and detailed contact information enhances trust. The company appears to be a small-sized enterprise with a clear local focus in Latvia. The website's marketing and analytics tools suggest an intent to monitor and optimize user engagement. No evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries beyond the website developer was found.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture. It employs HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, uses Google Analytics and Google Ads for tracking, and avoids exposing sensitive data in the HTML. However, no explicit security headers were detected in the provided data, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are present. The absence of a security.txt file and incident contact emails limits the site's readiness for security incident handling. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small business but could be improved by implementing recommended HTTP security headers, publishing security policies, and enhancing SSL/TLS configurations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Conduct an SSL/TLS audit to ensure strong encryption standards and eliminate any weak cipher suites or protocol versions.
  3. Publish a security.txt file and provide clear incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness for security issues.
  4. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and tracking tools to mitigate risks from vulnerable libraries.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimization to improve user experience and search engine visibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA "RSGA"
Registration number
40003811272
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA RSGA
Description
SIA "RSGA" kopš 2006. gada nodarbojas ar ceļu un pievedceļu būvniecību, dažādu sarežģītības pakāpes zemes darbu veikšanu, atkritumu poligonu rekultivāciju un saistītiem pakalpojumiem. Uzņēmums piedāvā profesionālus un efektīvus risinājumus, izmantojot modernas tehnoloģijas un standartus, ar vairāk nekā 15 gadu pieredzi nozarē.
Key services
Smilšu tirdzniecība, Hidrosēja, Zemes darbi, Alternatīvā ikdienas pārklāšana, Industriālais dezodorants un pretputekļu apstrāde, Plānošanas un biznesa attīstības pakalpojumi
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.5.1, Font Awesome 4.7.0, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Custom CSS and JS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Ads
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Ads (AW-468816639)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain dates extracted.
  3. Comprehensive cookie and privacy policies present with consent mechanisms.
  4. No terms of service or explicit security policies found.
  5. Contact information is complete and consistent with company registration data.
  6. No security.txt or incident response contacts found.
  7. Website uses standard web technologies and includes Google Analytics and Google Ads tracking.
  8. No adult or questionable content detected; content is business and service focused.
  9. Website design and navigation are professional and user-friendly.
  10. Security headers and SSL configuration details not available from provided data; recommend audit.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using standard web technologies including jQuery 3.5.1 and Font Awesome 4.7.0, with custom CSS and JavaScript for UI and cookie consent management. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics are integrated for marketing and analytics purposes. The site is mobile responsive with good navigation and content structure. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected in the HTML content. No CMS or hosting provider information was identified. The site lacks advanced frameworks or platforms but is sufficient for the business needs. Opportunities exist to improve technical SEO, accessibility, and security headers to modernize the infrastructure and reduce technical debt.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rsga.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rsga.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.