Skip to main content

Security report for rrpartners.lv

R|R Law and Finance · Finance · Latvia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

R|R Law and Finance is a specialized legal and financial consulting firm based in Latvia, offering expert services in AML compliance, sanctions requirements, investment attraction, insurance case consulting, licensing, business purchase and sale, and internal business process optimization. The company targets businesses and individuals seeking professional advisory services in these domains, positioning itself as a trusted partner with a focus on practical, experience-based solutions. The website is professionally designed, multilingual, and provides clear contact channels including phone, email, and social media profiles, enhancing accessibility and client engagement. Technically, the website is built using the Astro framework and hosted on Hostinger, leveraging modern web technologies and Google Fonts for a polished appearance. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices, though accessibility features could be further enhanced. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and secure forms, but lacks some recommended security headers and explicit security policies. No WHOIS data was available due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the security posture is good with no evident vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. Privacy compliance is addressed with a privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism, reflecting GDPR awareness. The absence of terms of service and vulnerability disclosure policies suggests areas for improvement. The business credibility is supported by professional content, clear contact information, and trust signals such as LinkedIn profiles. The website is safe for general audiences with no adult or questionable content detected.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Cloudflare

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rrpartners.lv

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
70
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

R|R Law and Finance operates in the niche market of legal and financial consulting in Latvia, focusing on compliance with AML and sanctions regulations, investment consulting, and business transaction advisory. Their competitive advantage lies in combining legal expertise with financial analysis and practical experience, targeting clients who require specialized knowledge in regulatory compliance and business optimization. The business model is consultancy-based, generating revenue through expert advisory services. The firm maintains a professional online presence with multilingual support to cater to a broader regional audience. Partnerships with entities like siagp.lv and graphdo.net indicate a collaborative ecosystem. Growth indicators include active recruitment for finance, legal, and compliance professionals, suggesting expansion ambitions.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and secure contact forms featuring validation. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No security or incident response policies are published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present, limiting transparency and readiness for security incidents. The site does not appear to use tracking or analytics scripts that could introduce privacy risks. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be improved by implementing recommended headers, publishing security policies, and establishing a formal vulnerability disclosure process.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish explicit security and incident response policies on the website to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve trust with security researchers.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to ensure no vulnerable libraries are included.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
R|R Law and Finance
Description
Mēs specializējamies sankciju prasību, investīciju piesaistes, apdrošināšanas gadījumu, AML prasību, biznesa pirkšanas un pārdošanas konsultācijās, kā arī uzņēmumu iekšējo procesu efektivizēšanā.
Key services
AML and Sanctions Compliance Consulting, Investment Attraction Consulting, Insurance Case Legal and Financial Consulting, Licensing Consulting, Business Purchase and Sale Consulting, Internal Business Process Optimization
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Hostinger Website Builder, Astro framework, Google Fonts, SVG icons
Frameworks
Astro
Platforms
Hostinger
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure contact forms with validation

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear navigation and multilingual support (LV, EN, PL, RU).
  2. Contact information is prominently displayed including phone, email, physical address, and contact form.
  3. Privacy policy and cookie consent are implemented, indicating GDPR awareness.
  4. No terms of service or explicit security policies found.
  5. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error; limits domain legitimacy verification.
  6. No advertising or tracking scripts detected; minimal user tracking.
  7. Social media presence includes LinkedIn, Facebook, Twitter profiles for key personnel.
  8. Technical stack is modern and uses Astro framework with Hostinger hosting.
  9. No security headers detected in provided data; recommend adding for improved security posture.
  10. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found; consider adding for transparency.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Astro framework and hosted by Hostinger, indicating a modern and scalable infrastructure. Use of Google Fonts and SVG icons contributes to a visually appealing and performant design. The site is mobile optimized and supports multiple languages, enhancing accessibility and reach. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization in loading times and resource management. The absence of advanced analytics or tracking scripts suggests a privacy-conscious approach but limits marketing insights. Technical debt appears low, but the lack of security headers and formal policies indicates areas for modernization to align with best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rrpartners.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rrpartners.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.