Skip to main content

Security report for rrar.com

Raleigh Regional Association of REALTORS® · Real Estate · United States

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Raleigh Regional Association of REALTORS® (RRAR) is a regional professional association serving real estate agents and affiliates in the Raleigh, North Carolina area. The organization provides membership services, professional development opportunities, advocacy, and community engagement to support its members. The website reflects a mature membership association model with clear navigation, event calendars, and resources tailored to real estate professionals. Technically, the site uses a mix of modern JavaScript libraries and tracking tools such as Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel, hosted on a CMS platform identified as Accrisoft. The site is mobile-optimized and uses HTTPS, ensuring secure communications. However, there is no visible cookie consent mechanism, and security headers are not detected, which could be improved for better compliance and security posture. The WHOIS data for the domain is missing or unavailable, which raises questions about domain registration transparency but does not necessarily indicate malicious intent given the professional nature of the site. Overall, the site is trustworthy and serves its business purpose effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rrar.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
35
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

RRAR operates as a medium-sized regional association in the real estate sector, focusing on membership services, education, advocacy, and networking. Its business model relies on member dues, event registrations, and affiliate partnerships. The association maintains a strong local presence with partnerships to related service providers such as the REALTOR® Store and giving networks. The website content and structure indicate a well-established organization targeting real estate professionals in the Raleigh area. The absence of detailed company founding data or parent company information suggests it operates independently. The association's digital presence is professional but could benefit from enhanced privacy and security disclosures to align with evolving regulatory requirements.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good baseline security posture with enforced HTTPS and no visible exposure of sensitive data. The use of reputable analytics and tracking services is standard but requires transparent cookie consent to comply with privacy laws. The absence of security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are published, which limits transparency in security incident handling. The missing WHOIS data is a concern for domain legitimacy verification and should be investigated further. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but has room for improvement in compliance and defense-in-depth measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish an incident response policy or contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure domain legitimacy and trust.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Raleigh Regional Association of REALTORS®
Description
A regional association serving real estate professionals in the Raleigh area, providing membership services, professional development, advocacy, and community involvement.
Key services
Membership enrollment and benefits, Professional development and continuing education, Advocacy and legislative updates, Events and networking, Community volunteer opportunities
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Google Tag Manager, Zoombox, iframe-lightbox, js-cookie
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure cookies (js-cookie library)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is focused on real estate association services in Raleigh, NC.
  3. No email addresses explicitly found in HTML content.
  4. Phone number and physical address clearly provided in footer.
  5. Multiple external trusted domains linked for resources and partners.
  6. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and tracking tools.
  7. No explicit cookie consent mechanism detected.
  8. Privacy and terms of use pages are present and linked.
  9. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  10. No visible security headers detected in HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Accrisoft CMS platform and leverages common JavaScript libraries including jQuery, Zoombox, and iframe-lightbox for UI components. It integrates Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel for user tracking and marketing analytics, managed via Google Tag Manager. The site loads external fonts from Google Fonts and icons from Font Awesome CDN. Performance is moderate with asynchronous script loading and responsive design for mobile devices. Accessibility features are basic, with room for improvement in semantic markup and ARIA attributes. SEO optimization is basic, with meta tags present but minimal keyword and description content. The site is hosted on an unknown provider, but HTTPS is enforced with a presumably valid SSL certificate. Overall, the technical infrastructure is stable but could benefit from modernization and enhanced accessibility and SEO practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rrar.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rrar.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.