Skip to main content

Security report for rpwmct.com

LiveJasmin · Media · N/a

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LiveJasmin is a prominent adult entertainment platform specializing in live webcam shows and adult chat services. The website offers a large variety of performers, including girls, couples, and fetish categories, targeting an adult audience globally. The platform supports multiple languages and provides various interactive features such as private shows, video calls, and interactive toys. The business model is based on pay-per-minute and subscription services, positioning LiveJasmin as a leader in the adult live cam market. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies including React, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, and hCaptcha for bot protection, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. The website is mobile-optimized and includes comprehensive cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR requirements. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and age verification but lacks visible security headers and published security policies, which are areas for improvement. The WHOIS data is missing or privacy-protected, which slightly reduces trust but is somewhat common in adult industry domains. Overall, LiveJasmin presents a professional and trustworthy front with room to enhance transparency and security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rpwmct.com

This scan found 17 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
55
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

LiveJasmin operates in the adult media sector with a large user base and extensive model catalog. Its competitive advantage lies in its scale, multilingual support, and diverse service offerings including exclusive and certified performers. Revenue streams include live show credits, private chats, and video calls. The platform integrates with trusted industry bodies such as RTA and ASACP, enhancing its compliance and reputation. The company appears to be part of a larger holding group (Docler Holding) based on script references. Growth indicators include frequent promotions, new model highlights, and a sophisticated filtering system to enhance user experience. The partnership ecosystem includes compliance organizations but lacks visible direct business partner domains. Strategic observations suggest a focus on user engagement and retention through interactive features and marketing tools.

Security posture

The security posture of LiveJasmin is moderate to good. HTTPS is enforced site-wide, and age verification mechanisms are in place to restrict access to adults. The use of hCaptcha helps mitigate automated abuse. Cookie consent is implemented with category-based controls, supporting privacy compliance. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options is a notable gap. There is no published security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure program visible on the site, which limits transparency and user trust in security matters. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The missing WHOIS data raises questions about domain registration transparency but does not directly indicate compromise. Overall, the site follows basic security best practices but should enhance its security disclosures and header implementations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to improve protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response information to increase transparency and user trust.
  3. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program and security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance contact information availability, including verified company emails and phone numbers, to improve business credibility.
  5. Review WHOIS domain registration details to ensure transparency and reduce suspicion related to privacy protection.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
LiveJasmin
Description
LiveJasmin offers live sex cams and adult chat services featuring webcam girls and couples. It provides HD live sex cam shows with over 2000 models available without registration.
Key services
Live webcam shows, Private chat, Video calls, VIP shows, Interactive toys
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, React (implied by react-container), Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, hCaptcha, Emarsys, Scarab Research
Frameworks
React (implied)
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Age verification
  • Cookie consent with category-based control
  • Use of hCaptcha for bot protection

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Hotjar
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Tag Manager
Tracking pixels
Hotjar, Emarsys
Marketing tools
Emarsys, Scarab Research
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is adult content platform with age verification.
  2. Comprehensive filtering and categorization of performers.
  3. Use of multiple languages and localization.
  4. Strong use of modern web technologies and tracking tools.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on main page.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, possibly due to privacy or proxy registration.
  7. Security headers not explicitly visible in provided data.
  8. Cookie consent and privacy policy implemented with GDPR compliance.
  9. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based front end, likely React, with asynchronous loading of scripts and assets from a dedicated CDN (dditscdn.com). It integrates multiple third-party services for analytics (Google Tag Manager, Hotjar), marketing (Emarsys, Scarab Research), and bot protection (hCaptcha). The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design elements and supports multiple languages with hreflang tags. Performance is moderate, with some heavy script usage but optimized asset delivery. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting appears to be managed by Docler Holding or related infrastructure. Accessibility features are basic, with room for improvement in ARIA roles and keyboard navigation. SEO is well addressed with meta tags, Open Graph, and structured data in JSON-LD format. Overall, the technical infrastructure is robust but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and security header implementation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rpwmct.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rpwmct.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.