Skip to main content

Security report for rp9.ee

RP9 OÜ · Hospitality · Estonia

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

44/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

RP9 OÜ operates a pub named Pubi RP9 located at Raekoja Plats 9 in Tartu, Estonia. The business focuses on hospitality services including food and beverage offerings, sports event broadcasting, and table reservations. The website provides a comprehensive menu with detailed descriptions and pricing, targeting local residents and visitors interested in social dining and sports entertainment. The company is a small-sized entity founded in 2017, with a consistent brand presence and clear contact information. Technically, the website is built on the concrete5 CMS platform, utilizing common web technologies such as jQuery, Bootstrap, and Google Analytics. The site is mobile-optimized and offers a good user experience with clear navigation and professional design. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data, but lacks important security headers and formal security policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to the absence of privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the domain registration is transparent and consistent with the business claims, indicating legitimacy.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rp9.ee

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
44

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

RP9 OÜ positions itself as a community-focused pub in Tartu, leveraging a detailed menu and sports event broadcasts to attract customers. The business model centers on onsite hospitality services with additional offerings such as table booking for groups. The company maintains an active Facebook presence and partners with Wolt for delivery services. Revenue streams likely include food and beverage sales and event-related promotions. The business shows moderate digital maturity with a functional website but lacks advanced privacy and security compliance features. There is opportunity for growth by enhancing privacy policies and security posture to build greater customer trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. There is no published incident response contact or vulnerability disclosure policy, which limits transparency and preparedness. Privacy compliance is insufficient, with no privacy or cookie policies present, potentially exposing the business to GDPR compliance risks. The use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager indicates moderate user tracking without explicit consent mechanisms. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires improvements to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Establish an incident response contact email (e.g., security@rp9.ee) and consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file.
  4. Improve accessibility features to enhance usability for all users and comply with accessibility standards.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks and improve user trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
RP9 OÜ
Registration number
123456
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
RP9 OÜ
Description
RP9 is a pub located in Tartu, Estonia at Raekoja Plats 9. It is described as a gathering place for free people, a place where ideas are born and world-changing thoughts are sown. The pub offers a wide variety of food and drinks including a detailed menu of starters, main dishes, desserts, alcoholic and non-alcoholic beverages. It also broadcasts sports events and provides table booking services.
Key services
Food and beverage service, Sports event broadcasting, Table reservations
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap 3.3.7, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Slick Carousel, Featherlight Lightbox
Frameworks
concrete5 CMS 8.2.0
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a fully accessible pub site with detailed menu and contact info.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. No security.txt or incident response contacts found.
  4. Uses standard web technologies and CMS concrete5.
  5. No WAF or blocking detected.
  6. WHOIS data is transparent and consistent.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on concrete5 CMS version 8.2.0, using jQuery and Bootstrap 3.3.7 for frontend components. It integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for traffic analysis and user tracking. The site uses Slick Carousel and Featherlight Lightbox for image galleries. Hosting appears to be managed by Zone Media OÜ, consistent with the domain registrar. Performance is moderate with lazy loading for images and responsive design for mobile devices. The HTML structure is valid and SEO basics are covered with meta tags and descriptive content. However, there is room for improvement in accessibility and security header implementation. The site does not use modern frontend frameworks but remains functional and user-friendly.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rp9.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rp9.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.