Skip to main content

Security report for roxart.pl

Agencja Reklamowa ROXart - kompleksowa obsługa firm. · Media · Poland

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Agencja Reklamowa ROXart is a modern, Poland-based advertising agency specializing in comprehensive marketing services including Google ADS, social media campaigns, website creation, and graphic design. The company positions itself as a full-service agency with an international reach, targeting businesses seeking to enhance their brand presence and digital marketing effectiveness. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with good content quality and clear service offerings. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and integrations such as Cookiebot for consent management and Google Tag Manager for analytics, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though some security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is well addressed with a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie management. Overall, the site is trustworthy and well-structured, supporting the agency's business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 22 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching roxart.pl

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
37
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The agency operates in the media sector, offering a broad range of marketing services from paid ads to influencer collaborations and SEO. Its business model is service-oriented, focusing on digital marketing solutions for clients. The presence of multiple social media channels and client logos suggests active engagement and a growing client base. The domain age and WHOIS data align with the company's founding year, supporting legitimacy. The agency leverages multiple marketing and analytics tools to optimize campaigns and track user engagement, indicating a data-driven approach. No direct competitors or partner domains were identified in the data, but the agency appears well-positioned in the Polish market with ambitions for international reach.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms in place. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap that could be exploited. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of third-party scripts is extensive, which requires ongoing monitoring to mitigate supply chain risks. There is no published security policy or incident response contact, which limits transparency in case of security events. GDPR compliance is indicated by the privacy and cookie policies, but further documentation on data protection officer contact or vulnerability disclosure is missing. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be enhanced with additional policies and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen defense against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and provide clear incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to minimize vulnerabilities from external dependencies.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet recognized standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Agencja Reklamowa ROXart
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Agencja Reklamowa ROXart - kompleksowa obsługa firm.
Description
Prowadzimy skuteczne kampanie reklamowe - Google ADS, Social Media. Tworzymy strony internetowe, projekty graficzne i wiele więcej.
Key services
Google ADS campaigns, Social Media marketing, Website creation, Graphic design, Branding, Paid advertising, Content marketing, E-commerce stores, Influencer collaboration, SEO
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, LiteSpeed Cache, Yoast SEO, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, jQuery, YouTube iframe API, GetResponse Analytics, Snitcher analytics, Fastcall widget
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security and analytics scripts with crossorigin attributes

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, GetResponse Analytics, Snitcher
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Facebook Ads, TikTok Ads, YouTube Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, TikTok Pixel, Snitcher tracking
Marketing tools
GetResponse Analytics, Cookiebot, LiteSpeed Cache
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional advertising agency site with comprehensive marketing services.
  2. Strong use of third-party analytics and marketing tools with proper cookie consent.
  3. No visible security or privacy policy documents beyond privacy and cookie policies.
  4. No terms of service or security incident contact information found.
  5. Good SEO and structured data implementation.
  6. No WAF or blocking detected; site fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1 with a modern tech stack including LiteSpeed Cache for performance optimization, Yoast SEO for search engine optimization, and Cookiebot for GDPR-compliant cookie management. Analytics and marketing integrations include Google Tag Manager, GetResponse Analytics, Snitcher, and social media pixels from Facebook, TikTok, and YouTube. The site loads multiple external resources such as Google Fonts and Vimeo player scripts. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility. Structured data is implemented via JSON-LD for SEO benefits. Hosting provider details are not explicit. The technical setup is robust but could benefit from enhanced security headers and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with roxart.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review roxart.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.