Skip to main content

Security report for routeco.com

Attention Required! | Cloudflare · Energy · N/a

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website routeco.com is currently inaccessible due to a Cloudflare Web Application Firewall (WAF) block, presenting a security challenge page instead of business content. This prevents direct analysis of the website's content, policies, or contact information. The domain is mature, registered since 1997, and protected with strong domain status flags, indicating a legitimate business presence. However, the lack of a valid SSL/TLS certificate and the presence of a WAF block significantly limit the ability to assess the website's security posture and user experience. Technically, the site is hosted behind Cloudflare, which provides DNS and security services, but the absence of HTTPS and modern TLS protocols is a critical security gap. The security headers are partially implemented but insufficient without proper SSL. Performance and SEO cannot be evaluated due to the blocked content. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are visible, nor is any contact information or business metadata. From a security perspective, the site suffers from critical issues including no SSL, no HSTS, and no OCSP stapling. The Cloudflare WAF block suggests active protection against potential threats but also impacts legitimate user access. The domain WHOIS data is consistent and trustworthy, with no suspicious patterns detected. Overall, the website's current state poses a high risk for user trust and accessibility. Strategic recommendations include immediate SSL certificate deployment, reviewing WAF rules to avoid blocking legitimate users, publishing clear privacy and cookie policies, and providing accessible contact information to improve business credibility and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching routeco.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
35
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Routeco.com appears to represent a mature business likely operating in the energy and transportation sectors, given the domain name and DNS email routing through Mimecast and Microsoft services. The domain age and registrar information indicate a stable and established entity. However, the lack of accessible website content limits insights into market positioning, revenue streams, or customer segments. The use of Cloudflare for DNS and security suggests a focus on protecting digital assets, though the current blocking state may hinder customer engagement. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identifiable from the available data. The business likely targets industrial or commercial clients requiring secure and reliable supply chain or technology services.

Security posture

The security posture of routeco.com is currently weak due to the absence of a valid SSL/TLS certificate and modern encryption protocols. While Cloudflare provides a WAF that actively blocks suspicious traffic, the lack of HTTPS undermines secure communications. Security headers are partially present but insufficient to compensate for missing encryption. No evidence of incident response contacts, vulnerability disclosure policies, or security certifications is found. The domain's WHOIS data is well-protected and consistent, which is a positive trust indicator. Overall, the site requires urgent remediation to enable HTTPS, improve header configurations, and publish security policies to enhance compliance and user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate supporting TLS 1.2 or TLS 1.3 to secure all website traffic.
  2. Configure HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload directives to enforce HTTPS.
  3. Review and adjust Cloudflare WAF rules to prevent blocking legitimate users and improve user accessibility.
  4. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to demonstrate GDPR compliance and transparency.
  5. Add clear contact information including security incident response contacts to improve trust and compliance.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted behind Cloudflare, which provides DNS and security services including a WAF and analytics beacon. The absence of SSL/TLS and modern protocols is a critical technical deficiency. The HTML content is minimal and represents a Cloudflare block page rather than the actual website, preventing assessment of CMS, frameworks, or other technologies. Performance metrics are unavailable due to blocked content. The DNS setup includes multiple A and AAAA records and uses Mimecast for email security. No CMS or JavaScript frameworks are detectable from the provided HTML. The site lacks SEO metadata and accessibility features in the accessible content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with routeco.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review routeco.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.