Skip to main content

Security report for rostocker-wochenmaerkte.de

Großmarkt Rostock GmbH · Retail · Germany

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.rostocker-wochenmaerkte.de represents the Rostocker Wochenmärkte, a regional market operator in Rostock, Germany, offering weekly markets with a focus on fresh, regional products. The business also operates an online shop for merchandise and vouchers, targeting local residents and visitors interested in authentic local market experiences. The site is well-branded and consistent with the parent company Großmarkt Rostock GmbH, indicating a solid local market presence. Technically, the website uses a modern but standard tech stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, and Klaro for cookie consent, hosted by Alfahosting. It is mobile-optimized and performs moderately well. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and cookie consent implemented, but lacks visible advanced security headers and explicit security policies. Privacy compliance is good with a privacy policy and cookie banner, including Google Analytics with IP anonymization and opt-out. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and safe for general audiences.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rostocker-wochenmaerkte.de

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
43
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Rostocker Wochenmärkte website positions itself as a key local market provider in Rostock, leveraging regional products and community engagement. Its business model combines physical weekly markets with an online merchandise shop, enhancing revenue streams and customer engagement. The partnership with Großmarkt Rostock GmbH and links to community initiatives like erlebedeinenmarkt.org strengthen its ecosystem. The target audience is local consumers and tourists seeking fresh regional goods and market experiences. The website content and structure support clear navigation and information dissemination, aiding customer retention and growth. No direct revenue or financial data is available, but the presence of an online shop and event markets suggests diversified income sources.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and privacy compliance is addressed with a cookie consent banner and privacy policy. Google Analytics is configured with IP anonymization and an opt-out mechanism, reflecting GDPR awareness. However, no explicit security headers (e.g., CSP, HSTS) were detected, and no public security or incident response policies are available. No forms or input fields on the homepage reduce attack surface, but contact forms on other pages should be reviewed for security. The use of third-party scripts like Klaro and Google Analytics requires ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. Overall, the site is secure for its purpose but could improve by implementing additional security headers and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible to users and partners to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
  5. Consider adding visible contact emails or phone numbers with anti-spam measures to improve user trust and communication.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Großmarkt Rostock GmbH
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Großmarkt Rostock GmbH
Description
Anbieter von regionalen Wochenmärkten in Rostock, mit Fokus auf frische, regionale Produkte und einem Onlineshop für Merchandise und Gutscheine.
Key services
Weekly markets with regional products, Online shop for merchandise and vouchers, Event markets (Erlebnismärkte)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 2.2.0, Bootstrap, Bootstrap Datepicker, Venobox, Klaro Cookie Consent
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled with anonymized IP in Google Analytics
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • Email obfuscation script used

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Cookie consent is implemented with Klaro.
  3. No explicit privacy or security policies beyond GDPR cookie consent and privacy page.
  4. No visible contact emails or phone numbers in the HTML content; contact likely via contact page.
  5. Use of multiple external domains for social media and shop integration.
  6. No forms detected on the homepage; contact forms likely on separate pages.
  7. Google Analytics is used with IP anonymization and opt-out function.
  8. No security headers detected in the provided data; potential improvement area.
  9. Hosting provider is Alfahosting, a known German hosting company.
  10. Website content is in German and targets local Rostock community.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional web technology stack with jQuery 2.2.0 and Bootstrap for responsive design, supplemented by plugins like Bootstrap Datepicker and Venobox for UI enhancements. Klaro is used for cookie consent management, indicating GDPR compliance efforts. Hosting is provided by Alfahosting, a reputable German hosting provider. The site loads moderately fast with deferred script loading and image lazy loading techniques. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or less common CMS. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured navigation. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility features are basic and could be improved. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rostocker-wochenmaerkte.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rostocker-wochenmaerkte.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.