Skip to main content

Security report for rosskopf.com

Hospitality · Italy

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.rosskopf.com represents a tourism and outdoor activity business focused on the Rosskopf ski and hiking area in Sterzing, South Tyrol, Italy. It offers information about skiing, hiking, tobogganing, and accommodation booking services. The site is professionally designed with good navigation and mobile optimization, leveraging modern technologies such as Consisto CMS, Google Analytics, and Tag Manager. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and security headers, though some headers like CSP are missing. Privacy compliance is limited, with no explicit privacy or cookie policies detected in the analyzed content. The WHOIS data is unavailable, which raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy but does not necessarily indicate malicious intent. Overall, the site appears trustworthy and suitable for general audiences interested in tourism in South Tyrol.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rosskopf.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
83
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention rosskopf.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for rosskopf.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the hospitality and tourism sector, targeting travelers and outdoor enthusiasts interested in skiing and hiking in South Tyrol. The website supports direct ticket sales via a linked external platform and provides accommodation search functionality. Partnerships with regional tourism sites like suedtirol.info and sterzing.com enhance its market presence. The business model appears to be service-oriented, focusing on tourism promotion and facilitating bookings. The site content and structure suggest a small to medium-sized enterprise with a regional focus.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a good SSL configuration and includes several security headers, enhancing protection against common web attacks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. However, the absence of a Content Security Policy and other modern security headers like Referrer-Policy and Permissions-Policy indicates room for improvement. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available, which could be enhanced to improve security transparency and readiness. Privacy compliance is minimal, lacking visible cookie consent mechanisms or detailed privacy policies, which may pose compliance risks under GDPR.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and prominently display a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add a Content Security Policy (CSP) header to mitigate cross-site scripting and related attacks.
  3. Include Referrer-Policy and Permissions-Policy headers to enhance privacy and security.
  4. Publish a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible security reporting.
  5. Improve transparency by providing contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer support and data protection officer if applicable.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Das Skigebiet Rosskopf liegt nur wenige Minuten vom Zentrum der Alpinstadt Sterzing in Südtirol entfernt. Auf der „Sterzinger Sonnenterrasse“ eröffnet sich
Key services
Skiing, Hiking, Tobogganing, Accommodation booking
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, CSS, HTML5, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Avacy Consent Management
Frameworks
Consisto CMS V4.7.0.0
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Avacy Consent Management
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich focused on tourism and outdoor activities in South Tyrol, Italy.
  2. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies detected in the analyzed content.
  4. Use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager indicates tracking but no explicit cookie consent mechanism detected in the snippet.
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  6. No data protection officer contact information found.
  7. No certifications or security frameworks mentioned.
  8. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which is a concern for domain legitimacy.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Consisto CMS version 4.7.0.0 and uses standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for tracking and marketing purposes. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and uses modern font loading techniques. Performance appears moderate with some asynchronous script loading. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected. The site lacks some advanced accessibility features but provides basic support. SEO optimization is good with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found in the content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 57/100Medium32 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rosskopf.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rosskopf.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.