Skip to main content

Security report for roshy.tv

Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf · Media · Iceland

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ROSHY.TV operates as a niche adult entertainment platform specializing in decensored Japanese adult videos with English subtitles, targeting adult viewers interested in this specific content type. The website leverages WordPress CMS with Elementor and integrates video player and advertising plugins to deliver streaming content and monetize via ads. The technical infrastructure includes Cloudflare DNS and NameCheap registrar with privacy protection, ensuring reasonable domain security and anonymity typical for adult content providers. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and some security headers, but lacks advanced DNS security and published security policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies and no consent mechanisms. Business credibility is moderate given the lack of contact information and registrant transparency. Overall, the site is functional and user-friendly but requires improvements in privacy compliance and security transparency to enhance trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching roshy.tv

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
55
Email security
65
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions itself in the adult media sector with a focus on decensored Japanese adult videos, a niche market segment. Its business model relies on content streaming and advertising revenue, supported by partnerships with live cam services and subtitle providers. The domain age and hosting setup are consistent with a small-sized, independent adult content provider. The lack of visible company contact details and privacy policies may limit growth potential and user trust. The site benefits from a clear navigation structure and targeted content, appealing to a specific audience segment. Strategic partnerships with related adult content and subtitle sites enhance its ecosystem. However, the absence of formal business disclosures and compliance documentation suggests an informal operational approach.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and domain status clientTransferProhibited is set, which protects against unauthorized domain transfers. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a notable gap in DNS security. No advanced security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP) were detected, and no published security or incident response policies exist. The site uses common WordPress plugins, which may introduce vulnerabilities if not regularly updated. No exposed sensitive data or credentials were found in the HTML content. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and similar regulations. Overall, the security posture is functional but could be significantly improved by implementing DNSSEC, CSP, and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance and consent mechanisms.
  3. Implement and publish a security policy and incident response plan with contact channels for abuse reporting.
  4. Add advanced security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP) to mitigate XSS and other attacks.
  5. Provide clear business contact information to improve trust and regulatory compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf
Description
Leaked Uncensored Japanese Adult Videos. Daily Updated Decensored JAV Porn.
Key services
Streaming of decensored JAV videos, English subtitles, Live cams via external links
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Yoast SEO, jQuery, Advanced Ads, Beeteam368 Video Player, Perfmatters
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited
  • Use of privacy protection for WHOIS

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Histats
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Advanced Ads, Quick Adsense Reloaded
Tracking pixels
Histats
Marketing tools
Google Analytics (gtag)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is an adult content streaming platform specializing in decensored Japanese adult videos with English subtitles.
  2. No visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses are provided.
  4. Site uses WordPress CMS with Elementor and several video and ad plugins.
  5. Advertising and tracking scripts are present, including Google Analytics and Histats.
  6. Security headers and HTTPS are present but DNSSEC is not enabled.
  7. WHOIS data is privacy protected, typical for adult content sites.
  8. No security or incident response policies or contacts are published.
  9. Site navigation and content structure are clear and user-friendly.
  10. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; site content is fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder, enhanced by Yoast SEO for search optimization and Beeteam368 video player plugins for media delivery. It uses jQuery and several advertising plugins including Advanced Ads and Quick Adsense Reloaded. Hosting is supported by Cloudflare DNS and NameCheap registrar with privacy protection. Performance is moderate with some lazy loading and caching optimizations via Perfmatters. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design. SEO is well addressed with meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Accessibility features are basic but present. The site lacks DNSSEC and advanced security headers, which are technical risks. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and adequate for content streaming but could benefit from enhanced security and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with roshy.tv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review roshy.tv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.