Skip to main content

Security report for roofmaster.lv

Roffmaster · Real Estate · Latvia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Roofmaster.lv is a Latvian small business specializing in flat roof installation, repair, and insulation services primarily targeting commercial, public, and multi-apartment buildings. The website is built on WordPress with WooCommerce and integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Yandex Metrika. The presence of structured data and social media links indicates a moderate level of digital maturity. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented, but lacks advanced security headers and published security policies. The absence of WHOIS data limits full trust assessment. Overall, the site presents a professional image but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
48/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching roofmaster.lv

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
48
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the real estate and construction sector, focusing on flat roofing solutions in Latvia. Its business model is service-oriented, catering to building owners requiring roof maintenance and upgrades. The website's multilingual support suggests targeting a diverse local audience. The integration with Bitrix24 CRM and marketing tools indicates an organized approach to customer management and lead generation. However, the lack of explicit contact details and privacy policies may impact customer trust and compliance. No evident partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the data.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, which are positive security practices. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information is present, and no incident response contacts are published. The use of multiple third-party scripts increases the attack surface and necessitates regular security audits. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with better transparency and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting and incident response.
  4. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer and security inquiries.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Roffmaster
Description
Plakano jumtu eksperti. Specializējamies komercēku, sabiedrisko un daudzdzīvokļu ēku jumtu remonta , siltināšanas un atjaunošanas darbos.
Key services
Flat roof installation, Roof replacement, Roof restoration, Roof repair, Insulation services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.2, WooCommerce 9.7.1, Yoast SEO plugin, Bitrix24 CRM integration, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Yandex Metrika, Cookiebot, jQuery 3.6.0, Advanced Woo Search plugin, WPML Multilingual CMS
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data found in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Yandex Metrika, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Yandex Metrika
Marketing tools
Bitrix24 CRM, Cookiebot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based small business site specialized in flat roof services in Latvia.
  2. Content is in Latvian with multilingual support (English and Russian).
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented via Cookiebot.
  5. Multiple tracking and marketing scripts are used including Facebook Pixel and Yandex Metrika.
  6. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet.
  7. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  9. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  10. Website uses structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO and business info.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform with WooCommerce for e-commerce capabilities. It uses popular plugins for SEO (Yoast), multilingual support (WPML), and CRM integration (Bitrix24). The site loads multiple external scripts asynchronously to optimize performance. Mobile optimization and SEO practices are good, with proper meta tags and structured data. However, accessibility features are basic and could be enhanced. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the data. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by multiple external dependencies.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with roofmaster.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review roofmaster.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.