Skip to main content

Security report for rongating.sk

RONGATING spol. s r.o. · Real Estate · Slovakia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

RONGATING spol. s r.o. is a Slovak engineering company specializing in structural design and steel constructions, serving clients across the European Union. The company offers professional services including static calculations, preparation of construction and execution drawings, and the production and delivery of steel structures. Positioned as a reliable and experienced partner with over a decade of practice, RONGATING targets project designers, construction firms, and investors within the EU market. The website reflects a professional business model with clear service offerings and client references. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern frameworks and plugins, ensuring good SEO and GDPR compliance. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA integration, though some PHP warnings and lack of explicit security headers suggest room for improvement. Overall, the website is trustworthy, well-structured, and compliant with privacy regulations.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rongating.sk

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
45
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a stable market position as a specialized engineering service provider in the construction sector, focusing on structural statics and steel constructions. Its business model combines consultancy, design, and manufacturing/delivery services, catering to a niche but critical segment in the EU construction market. The presence of partner logos and client references indicates a healthy partnership ecosystem and a credible reputation. The website's multilingual support (Slovak and German) suggests targeting broader European markets. Revenue streams likely derive from project-based contracts and steel construction supply. Growth indicators include a professional online presence and active social media engagement. Strategic observations highlight the importance of maintaining technical expertise and expanding partnerships to sustain market competitiveness.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and Google reCAPTCHA v3 is implemented to protect forms from abuse. The cookie consent mechanism complies with GDPR requirements, providing opt-in consent and detailed cookie categories. However, visible PHP warnings in the HTML source indicate potential information leakage and coding issues that could be exploited. The absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No public security policy or incident response contact information is available, which is a compliance gap. Data protection practices appear adequate, but incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not evident. Overall, the security posture is functional but could be enhanced by addressing coding errors and adding security headers and policies.

Recommendations

  1. Fix PHP warnings and errors in the website templates to prevent information leakage and improve code quality.
  2. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to strengthen browser security.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and provide incident response contact channels to improve transparency and compliance.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain security hygiene.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct periodic security audits to maintain a robust security culture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
RONGATING spol. s r.o.
VAT number
SK2120052693
Registration number
48 105 848
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
RONGATING spol. s r.o.
Description
Ako skúsená inžinierska kancelária v oblasti statiky a oceľových konštrukcií ponúkame profesionálne služby pre stavebné projekty v celej Európskej únii. Našimi hlavnými oblasťami činnosti sú statické výpočty, vypracovanie realizačných a konštrukčných výkresov, ako aj výroba a dodávka oceľových konštrukcií.
Key services
statické výpočty, projektovanie nosných konštrukcií, realizačné a konštrukčné výkresy, výroba a dodávka oceľových konštrukcií
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Owl Carousel, Magnific Popup, Google reCAPTCHA v3, Rank Math SEO plugin, Complianz GDPR plugin, WordPress 6.4.5
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 implemented
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Rank Math SEO, Complianz GDPR Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking mechanisms
  2. Professional engineering services company focused on structural design and steel constructions
  3. Good GDPR and cookie compliance with opt-in consent
  4. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices
  5. Some minor PHP warnings visible in HTML which should be fixed
  6. Clear contact information and social media presence
  7. No evidence of security policy or incident response info publicly available
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.4.5, utilizing Bootstrap for responsive design and jQuery for interactivity. It employs popular plugins such as Rank Math for SEO optimization and Complianz for GDPR cookie consent management. Google reCAPTCHA v3 is integrated for spam protection. The site loads multiple JavaScript libraries and CSS stylesheets, including Owl Carousel for sliders and Magnific Popup for modals. Performance is moderate with some heavy slider elements but generally optimized for desktop and mobile. Minor technical debt is indicated by PHP warnings visible in the HTML output, which should be addressed. SEO is well-managed with proper meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Hosting provider details are not explicitly detected. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and functional but requires maintenance to fix minor issues.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rongating.sk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rongating.sk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.