Skip to main content

Security report for rokarestaurant.com

ROKA · Hospitality · N/a

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

79/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ROKA is a premium hospitality business specializing in Japanese Robatayaki cuisine with multiple international locations including London, Dubai, and Istanbul. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image targeting customers seeking high-end dining experiences. The technical infrastructure leverages modern web technologies including JavaScript frameworks, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, and Cookiebot for privacy compliance. Embedded third-party forms and payment processing via Stripe and reservation management via Sevenrooms indicate a mature digital ecosystem. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, CSRF protection, and cookie consent mechanisms, though explicit security policies and incident response contacts are absent. The lack of WHOIS data introduces some uncertainty about domain legitimacy, but the overall website quality and business presentation are trustworthy. Strategic recommendations include improving transparency around security policies and contact information to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rokarestaurant.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
75
Email security
65
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
79

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention rokarestaurant.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
4
Employees
0
Customers
2
Third parties
2
Weak passwords
0%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for rokarestaurant.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ROKA operates as a medium-sized hospitality entity with a focus on Japanese cuisine in major global cities. Its business model centers on premium dining experiences supported by digital reservation and payment platforms. The company benefits from partnerships with Sevenrooms and Stripe, enhancing operational efficiency. Market positioning is strong within the niche of Japanese Robatayaki restaurants, supported by award-winning recognition. The website's multi-language support and detailed cookie consent reflect attention to international customer segments and regulatory compliance. Growth potential is indicated by international presence and digital maturity, though further public business information would improve credibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with enforced HTTPS, CSRF token usage, and comprehensive cookie consent management. Use of secure cookies and integration with reputable third-party services reduces risk exposure. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms limits transparency and preparedness. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Compliance with GDPR is evident through cookie consent and privacy policy. Enhancing security documentation and providing direct security contact channels would strengthen the security culture and incident readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security frameworks and practices.
  2. Add a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  3. Provide explicit contact emails and phone numbers for customer and security inquiries.
  4. Verify and publish WHOIS domain registration details to improve trustworthiness.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and cookies to minimize privacy and security risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ROKA
Description
ROKA - Award-winning Japanese Robatayaki restaurants in London, Dubai, Istanbul and Middle east
Key services
Japanese Robatayaki dining, Restaurant reservations, Event hosting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, CSS, HTML5, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Cookiebot, Contacta.io forms
Frameworks
Cookiebot for cookie consent management
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • CSRF token meta tag present
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out
  • Use of secure cookies (XSRF-TOKEN, csrftoken)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS with secure cookies and CSRF protection
  2. Cookie consent is implemented with detailed cookie categories
  3. Multiple external analytics and marketing scripts are used
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content
  5. Contact forms are embedded via third-party service Contacta.io
  6. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page
  7. WHOIS data is missing, which is a concern for domain legitimacy
  8. Website content is rich and well structured with multi-language support
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based front-end framework with module preloading and CSS bundling, indicating a contemporary development approach. Integration with Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity supports advanced analytics and user behavior tracking. Cookiebot manages GDPR-compliant cookie consent with granular controls. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessible navigation. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed and accessibility features. Hosting provider and CMS are not explicitly identified. The technical stack supports scalability and internationalization but would benefit from enhanced security header implementation and explicit CMS identification.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rokarestaurant.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rokarestaurant.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.