Skip to main content

Security report for rodewischer-wohnbau.de

Rodewischer Wohnungsbau- & Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH · Real Estate · Germany

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Rodewischer Wohnungsbau- & Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH operates as a trusted local real estate rental and property management company based in Rodewisch, Germany. Their website presents a professional image with clear information about their services, including age-appropriate housing, barrier-free interiors, and central locations. The company targets residents and renters seeking reliable housing solutions in the region. The business model focuses on rental services and property support, positioning itself as a dependable local provider. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using Elementor and Yoast SEO, indicating a modern and maintainable infrastructure. The presence of CookieYes for cookie consent and GDPR compliance demonstrates awareness of privacy regulations. The site is mobile-optimized and uses structured data to enhance SEO. Hosting is managed via DomainControl (GoDaddy), a common provider for small businesses. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent mechanisms but lacks advanced security headers and explicit security policies or incident response contacts. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page suggests room for improvement in transparency and security maturity. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professionally maintained with good privacy compliance. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing security and incident response policies, and adding vulnerability disclosure mechanisms to strengthen security posture and stakeholder trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rodewischer-wohnbau.de

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
83
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a solid position as a local real estate rental service in Rodewisch, focusing on residential housing with special attention to accessibility and location convenience. Their competitive advantage lies in their trusted reputation and comprehensive service offerings including rental, technical support, and tenant comfort. Revenue streams are likely derived from rental income and property management fees. The target customer segment is local residents and renters, including elderly or mobility-impaired individuals needing barrier-free housing. The partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed, but the use of third-party services like CookieYes and hosting providers indicates standard operational partnerships. The website content and structure suggest a stable, small-sized business with a focus on customer trust and compliance.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented, aligning with GDPR requirements. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces the defense-in-depth posture. No incident response or security policy pages are published, which limits transparency and preparedness communication. The absence of a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure mechanism indicates a gap in vulnerability management and responsible disclosure practices. No exposed credentials or vulnerable libraries were detected, and forms appear standard without visible security issues. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small business but could benefit from enhancements to meet higher standards and regulatory expectations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to improve protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve security communication.
  4. Regularly audit and update all plugins and themes to mitigate risks from known vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider conducting penetration testing and vulnerability assessments to proactively identify and remediate security weaknesses.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Rodewischer Wohnungsbau- & Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Rodewischer Wohnungsbau- & Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH
Description
Der Vermieter Ihres Vertrauens in Rodewisch. The company provides rental housing, barrier-free interior fittings, and centrally located residential solutions.
Key services
Vermietung, Wohnen, Wohlfühlen, Technik, Support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Elementor Pro, Elementskit Lite, Slider Revolution, jQuery, CookieYes Consent Management
Frameworks
Yoast SEO
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
YouTube embedded video tracking
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
CookieYes, YouTube (via embedded videos)
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO, Elementor Pro
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional real estate rental service for Rodewisch area.
  2. Uses WordPress CMS with Elementor and Yoast SEO plugins.
  3. Implements GDPR-compliant cookie consent with CookieYes.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided including phone, email, and physical address.
  5. No visible security policy or incident response information.
  6. No terms of service page detected.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  8. No social media links explicitly found in the HTML content.
  9. Website is well structured with good SEO metadata and JSON-LD structured data.
  10. No signs of adult or questionable content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a widely used CMS platform, WordPress, enhanced with Elementor page builder and Yoast SEO for content management and search optimization. The use of Elementskit Lite and Slider Revolution adds advanced UI components and interactive elements. The site loads external fonts and scripts from trusted sources and uses CookieYes for GDPR-compliant cookie management. Hosting is provided via DomainControl, a GoDaddy service, indicating a standard shared hosting environment. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. The site uses JSON-LD structured data for SEO enhancement. Technical risks include potential plugin vulnerabilities and missing security headers, which should be addressed to maintain operational integrity.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rodewischer-wohnbau.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rodewischer-wohnbau.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.