Skip to main content

Security report for rochefort-ocean.com

Office de Tourisme de Rochefort Océan · Hospitality · France

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Office de Tourisme de Rochefort Océan operates as a regional tourism office providing comprehensive information and services related to tourism in the Rochefort Océan area of France. The website offers details on accommodations, events, local attractions, and thermal cures, targeting tourists and visitors interested in this coastal region. The business model focuses on tourism promotion and facilitating bookings and event ticketing, positioning itself as a key regional tourism resource. Technically, the website is built on Drupal CMS with AngularJS and Bootstrap frameworks, integrating modern web technologies such as Google Maps API, Matomo analytics, and Crisp chat for user engagement. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation and SEO practices, although accessibility features are basic. Performance is moderate, with a professional design and consistent branding. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and includes several security headers, along with a cookie consent mechanism indicating some privacy compliance. However, the absence of a dedicated privacy policy page and incident response information represents gaps in compliance and security transparency. No vulnerabilities or malicious content were detected, and the site maintains a good security posture overall. The WHOIS data is missing, with the domain appearing unregistered or expired in the registry, which raises concerns about domain legitimacy. Despite this, the website content and presentation suggest a legitimate tourism office. Monitoring domain registration status is recommended to ensure continued trustworthiness. Overall, the site is a well-constructed regional tourism platform with room for improvement in privacy compliance and domain registration transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rochefort-ocean.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
25
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Office de Tourisme de Rochefort Océan holds a strong regional market position as the official tourism office for the Rochefort Océan area, serving tourists interested in coastal vacations, cultural sites, and thermal cures. Its competitive advantage lies in comprehensive local content, multi-language support, and integrated booking and ticketing services. Revenue streams likely include commissions from accommodation bookings and event ticket sales. The target customer segments are leisure tourists, families, and wellness visitors. The partnership ecosystem includes social media platforms and mapping services, enhancing outreach and user experience. Strategic observations highlight the importance of maintaining domain legitimacy and enhancing privacy transparency to sustain growth and trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with enforced HTTPS, use of security headers, and a cookie consent framework. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified. However, the lack of a privacy policy and incident response contacts indicates compliance gaps, particularly regarding GDPR and vulnerability disclosure. Data protection practices appear basic, with no evidence of a dedicated Data Protection Officer or security certifications. Incident response readiness is unclear, and security culture indicators are minimal. The site would benefit from implementing a security.txt file, publishing privacy and security policies, and enhancing user data protection measures to improve overall security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page detailing GDPR compliance and data handling practices.
  2. Implement a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and incident reporting.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact information, including security and abuse email addresses.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to meet WCAG standards for broader user inclusivity.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Office de Tourisme de Rochefort Océan
Description
Découvrez Rochefort Océan, pays de fort boyard. Cure thermale et musées à Rochefort, locations vacances, hôtels, Fouras, Ile d’Aix, Ile Madame, Port-des-Barques. Réservez les bons plans et week-end bord de mer.
Key services
Tourism information, Accommodation booking, Event ticketing, Local activities and sightseeing, Thermal cure information
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
AngularJS, Drupal CMS, Bootstrap, jQuery, Google Maps API, Matomo Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Crisp Chat
Frameworks
AngularJS, Drupal
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Consent framework for cookies
  • Use of security headers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo, Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Matomo Analytics, Crisp Chat
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a regional tourism office site for Rochefort Océan area in France
  2. Content is in French with alternate language versions (English, German)
  3. Site uses modern web technologies and analytics tools
  4. No privacy policy page found, but cookie consent mechanism is implemented
  5. Contact phone number and contact form link are clearly provided
  6. No WHOIS registration data found, indicating possible domain registration issues
  7. No security.txt or incident response information found
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a solid technical foundation using Drupal CMS combined with AngularJS and Bootstrap for frontend responsiveness. Integration with Google Maps API and Matomo analytics indicates a mature approach to user engagement and data analysis. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization in load times and resource management. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly, though accessibility is basic. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts which require regular security audits. Modernization opportunities include upgrading AngularJS to a newer framework version and enhancing accessibility compliance. Overall, the infrastructure supports the business needs effectively with manageable technical debt.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rochefort-ocean.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rochefort-ocean.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.