Skip to main content

Security report for roche.de

Roche · Healthcare · Germany

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Roche Deutschland is a leading healthcare company focused on innovative medicines, diagnostics, and digital health technologies. The website reflects a mature digital presence built on modern frameworks such as React and Gatsby, with integration of advanced marketing and analytics tools including OneTrust for cookie consent, Google Tag Manager, and Adobe Launch. The site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and professionally designed, targeting patients, healthcare professionals, and partners. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement and security headers, though explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not published. Privacy compliance is partially demonstrated through cookie consent but lacks a clearly linked privacy policy or terms of service. WHOIS data confirms domain legitimacy and consistency with the corporate identity. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional, with room for improvement in transparency and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching roche.de

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention roche.de, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
6
Employees
0
Customers
6
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
50%

5 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for roche.de.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Roche operates in the healthcare sector with a strong focus on pharmaceutical innovation and diagnostics. The business model centers on research, development, production, and distribution of medicines and diagnostic tests. The website content and structure indicate a large enterprise with a significant workforce in Germany. The company targets a broad audience including patients and healthcare providers. The digital ecosystem includes partnerships with recognized service providers for analytics, marketing, and content management. The site’s content quality and branding consistency support Roche's market position as a trusted healthcare leader.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS, security headers, and cookie consent mechanisms. However, it lacks publicly accessible security policies, incident response procedures, and vulnerability disclosure information, which are important for transparency and trust. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The absence of direct security contact channels is a gap in incident response readiness. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by publishing comprehensive security and privacy documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a clear and accessible privacy policy and terms of service pages linked from the homepage/footer.
  2. Add a dedicated security policy and incident response information including contact channels for security issues.
  3. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Provide explicit contact information including emails and phone numbers for general and security inquiries.
  5. Enhance transparency around data protection officer contact details and data retention policies.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Roche
Description
Roche Deutschland employs around 18,200 people working passionately to improve health and life of patients. They research, develop, produce and distribute innovative medicines, diagnostic tests and digital technologies for a better life and sustainable future.
Key services
Innovative medicines, Diagnostic tests, Digital healthcare technologies
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Gatsby, React, OneTrust (cookie consent), Google Tag Manager, Adobe Launch, Brightcove, AWS Cognito, Storyblok CMS, Cludo search
Frameworks
React, Gatsby
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • Use of security headers
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Adobe Launch
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
LinkedIn Ads
Tracking pixels
Adobe Launch
Marketing tools
OneTrust, Cludo search, Brightcove video platform
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Content is professional and relevant to healthcare industry
  3. Strong use of modern web technologies and frameworks
  4. Cookie consent and privacy mechanisms implemented via OneTrust
  5. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in provided content
  6. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies published
  8. WHOIS data consistent with legitimate corporate domain
  9. No suspicious or malicious indicators detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including React and Gatsby, ensuring good performance and mobile responsiveness. It uses Storyblok as a CMS and integrates multiple third-party services such as OneTrust for consent management, Google Tag Manager, Adobe Launch for analytics, and Brightcove for video content. The site employs security best practices like HTTPS and security headers. Performance is moderate with potential for optimization. Accessibility and SEO are well addressed. No technical debt or legacy technologies were detected. Hosting provider details are not explicit but likely enterprise-grade given the infrastructure.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with roche.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review roche.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.