Skip to main content

Security report for roboticheartcare.com

Stereotaxis · Healthcare · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Email security, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Robotic Heart Care, operated under the Stereotaxis brand, is a healthcare technology website focused on promoting and educating about robotic magnetic navigation (RMN) technology for cardiac ablation procedures. The site targets patients and physicians interested in advanced cardiac care solutions, emphasizing safety, precision, and clinical efficacy. The company positions itself as a global provider with adoption in over 100 hospitals and over 150,000 patients treated, supported by extensive clinical data and peer-reviewed publications. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using modern plugins such as WPBakery Page Builder and Yoast SEO, with embedded Vimeo videos and Google Analytics for tracking. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, clear navigation, and professional design, although some accessibility features could be improved. SEO practices are well implemented with comprehensive metadata and structured data. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data. However, no explicit security headers were detected, and privacy and cookie policies are absent, indicating gaps in compliance and user data protection. The WHOIS data is missing or indicates the domain may not be registered, which raises concerns about domain legitimacy despite the professional appearance and branding consistency. Overall, the website is informative and professionally presented but requires improvements in privacy compliance, security headers, and domain registration transparency to enhance trustworthiness and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching roboticheartcare.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
80
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention roboticheartcare.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for roboticheartcare.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website serves as a digital presence for Stereotaxis' robotic cardiac ablation technology, targeting healthcare professionals and patients. Its market positioning leverages clinical evidence and physician testimonials to establish credibility. The business model appears focused on technology provision and education rather than direct sales. The presence of partner domains and social media channels supports a broad partnership ecosystem. Growth indicators include extensive clinical data and global hospital adoption. Strategic observations suggest the company benefits from strong branding but should address domain registration clarity to avoid trust issues.

Security posture

The current security posture is moderate. HTTPS is enforced, and no sensitive data leaks are evident. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of visible privacy and cookie policies indicate compliance gaps. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, limiting transparency. The missing WHOIS data is a significant concern for domain legitimacy and trust. Overall, the site should enhance its security framework, implement comprehensive privacy policies, and provide clear incident response contacts to improve its security maturity and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure transparency and legitimacy.
  4. Provide clear contact information including security incident response and vulnerability disclosure channels.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Stereotaxis
Description
Robotics transforms cardiac ablation for arrhythmias, making the procedure safer and more efficient for patients and physicians.
Key services
Robotic Magnetic Navigation (RMN) technology, Robotic cardiac ablation solutions, Educational resources and clinical data dissemination
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WPBakery Page Builder, Yoast SEO, Google Analytics, Vimeo video embeds, jQuery, Ultimate VC Addons
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich multimedia content
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found
  3. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on main page
  4. Strong branding consistent with Stereotaxis company
  5. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices
  6. WHOIS data missing or domain unregistered raises legitimacy questions
  7. No security headers detected in provided data
  8. Social media presence is strong and consistent with brand
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using WPBakery Page Builder and Yoast SEO for content management and optimization. It integrates Vimeo for video content and Google Analytics for user tracking. The site demonstrates good mobile responsiveness and SEO metadata implementation. Performance is moderate with some large video assets. There is no evidence of advanced hosting provider details or CDN usage. Technical debt appears low, but improvements in security headers and privacy compliance are needed to reduce risk and enhance trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with roboticheartcare.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review roboticheartcare.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.