Skip to main content

Security report for robelshoes.eu

Robelshoes.eu · Retail · Slovakia

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Robelshoes.eu is an established European e-commerce retailer specializing in branded footwear and accessories. The website targets a broad audience across multiple European countries, offering a wide selection of products from well-known brands. The business model is focused on online retail with multi-language support and a clear product categorization structure. Technically, the site is built on the CREATIVE shop CMS platform, utilizing modern web technologies including HTTPS, Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection, and Sentry for error monitoring. While the site demonstrates good design and navigation, mobile optimization is basic and could be improved. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and some security best practices, but lacks explicit security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is common for e-commerce but limits transparency. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy with moderate risk.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Weak SPF Policy

      SPF record has permissive policy allowing any server to send email

      What to do: Use -all or ~all qualifier for better email security

  4. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching robelshoes.eu

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
90
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
80
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention robelshoes.eu, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for robelshoes.eu right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the retail sector, focusing on footwear and accessories with a presence in multiple European markets via localized domains. The business leverages partnerships with various footwear brands and maintains a consistent brand image across its sites. Revenue streams are primarily from online sales, supported by delivery and return policies. The multi-language and multi-country approach indicates a strategy to capture diverse European customer segments. The absence of detailed company registration data suggests privacy protection but no red flags. The partnership ecosystem includes related country-specific domains under the Robelshoes brand umbrella.

Security posture

Robelshoes.eu maintains a good security baseline with HTTPS enforced and integration of Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms from automated abuse. The use of Sentry indicates proactive error and incident monitoring. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published, which could hinder transparency and trust. Cookie consent mechanisms are missing, potentially impacting GDPR compliance. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and mechanism to comply with GDPR and improve user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to build trust and demonstrate security maturity.
  4. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to identify and mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance mobile responsiveness and accessibility features to improve user experience across devices.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Robelshoes.eu
Description
Underline your image with the right shoes and accessories on Robel.shoes. We offer you a wide selection of quality footwear from world brands, which you can also buy from the comfort of your home.
Key services
Online sales of branded footwear, Accessories sales, Customer support and delivery services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google reCAPTCHA, Sentry error tracking, Google Tag Manager, JSON-LD structured data, jQuery (implied by legacy code style)
Frameworks
CREATIVE shop CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA for forms
  • Sentry for error monitoring

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Sentry
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Sentry
Marketing tools
Sentry, Elfsight widgets
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a multi-language e-commerce platform focused on footwear and accessories.
  2. No WHOIS registrant data available due to privacy protection by EURid.
  3. Site uses HTTPS and includes Google reCAPTCHA and Sentry for security and monitoring.
  4. No explicit privacy or cookie consent banner detected, though privacy policy is present.
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  6. No phone numbers or physical addresses explicitly found in the provided content.
  7. Site navigation is clear with extensive product categorization and brand listings.
  8. No signs of adult or NSFW content.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the CREATIVE shop CMS platform, utilizing JavaScript libraries and services such as Google reCAPTCHA, Google Tag Manager, and Sentry for monitoring. The site uses JSON-LD structured data to enhance SEO and provide merchant return policy information. Performance is moderate with preloading of fonts and images, but mobile optimization is basic. The site architecture includes extensive navigation menus with multi-level categorization and brand listings. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected, but improvements in accessibility and modern security practices are recommended.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with robelshoes.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review robelshoes.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.