Skip to main content

Security report for rmhc-latvia.lv

Nodibinajums "Ronald McDonald House Charities Latvija" · Healthcare · Latvia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Nodibinajums "Ronald McDonald House Charities Latvija" is a Latvian non-profit organization dedicated to improving children's health through mobile healthcare services and medical consultations across regional areas. The organization maintains a professional web presence with clear branding, social media outreach, and comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, reflecting a commitment to transparency and compliance with GDPR. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with WooCommerce and WPBakery, leveraging modern web technologies and providing a good user experience with mobile optimization and SEO best practices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though there is room for improvement in security headers and incident response disclosures. Overall, the website and domain registration data align well, supporting the legitimacy and trustworthiness of the organization.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rmhc-latvia.lv

This scan found 21 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
39
Security headers
100
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates in the healthcare and non-profit sectors, targeting families with children in Latvia and healthcare partners. Its business model focuses on charitable healthcare services and fundraising. The website content and social media presence indicate active community engagement and partnership building. The lack of explicit phone or email contacts on the site suggests reliance on contact forms and social media for communication. The domain WHOIS data matches the organization's identity and location, reinforcing credibility. The website's technical infrastructure is modern but could benefit from enhanced security practices and incident response transparency.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and implements a cookie consent mechanism, demonstrating awareness of privacy and security requirements. However, no explicit security headers were detected, and there is no visible vulnerability disclosure or incident response policy, which are areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The security score is good but not excellent, indicating a mature but improvable security posture. Recommendations include adding security headers, publishing a security.txt file, and providing incident response contacts to enhance trust and readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to strengthen defense against common web attacks.
  2. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  3. Add clear incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness for security incidents.
  4. Regularly audit and update all WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate risks from outdated components.
  5. Enhance website accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Nodibinajums "Ronald McDonald House Charities Latvija"
Registration number
40008121853
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Nodibinajums "Ronald McDonald House Charities Latvija"
Description
Nodibinājums Ronald McDonald House Charities Latvija is a non-profit organization focused on children's health in Latvia, providing mobile healthcare services and medical consultations in regional areas.
Key services
Mobile health care center for children, Medical consultations by specialists, Community health support and fundraising
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, WPBakery Page Builder, jQuery, Select2, MediaElement.js, Font Awesome, Google Fonts
Frameworks
WooCommerce, WPBakery
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data found in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Jetpack Statistics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Jetpack Stats (wordpress.com)
Marketing tools
WooCommerce, Contact Form 7
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is focused on healthcare charity services for children in Latvia.
  3. Good implementation of privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in HTML; contact form present.
  5. Social media presence on major platforms supports trust and outreach.
  6. Technical stack is modern and based on WordPress with WooCommerce and WPBakery.
  7. No explicit security headers detected; SSL is properly configured.
  8. No evidence of vulnerability disclosure or incident response policies.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a WordPress CMS with WooCommerce for e-commerce capabilities and WPBakery Page Builder for content management. It loads multiple JavaScript libraries including jQuery, Select2, MediaElement.js, and Font Awesome icons. The site is hosted with resources loaded from WordPress.com CDN domains, indicating a managed hosting environment. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO meta tags present. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected. The site uses a cookie consent plugin (Complianz) for GDPR compliance. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and stable but could benefit from enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rmhc-latvia.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rmhc-latvia.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.