Skip to main content

Security report for rm.dk

Region Midtjylland · Healthcare · Denmark

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Region Midtjylland is a Danish regional public authority focused on healthcare, hospitals, specialized social services, and regional development. The website serves as an official portal for residents and stakeholders in the Central Denmark Region. The technical infrastructure is based on AngularJS with modern CSS and font usage, and includes GDPR-compliant cookie consent via Cookiebot. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks advanced security headers and published security policies. WHOIS data is unavailable, which slightly reduces trust but the official domain and content support legitimacy. Overall, the website is professional, accessible, and serves its public sector mission effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Domain Expires Soon

      Domain expires in 2 days

      What to do: Renew domain registration before expiration

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rm.dk

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
40
Email security
80
DNS health
55
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates as a government entity providing essential healthcare and social services. Its market position is that of a regional authority with a large operational scale. The business model is public sector funded, focusing on service delivery rather than commercial revenue. The website targets local residents and stakeholders, providing information and access to services. The absence of commercial advertising or affiliate programs aligns with its public service nature. The use of Danish language and local fonts reinforces regional identity. The lack of detailed WHOIS data is unusual but may be due to privacy or registry policies for government domains.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Cookiebot for cookie consent, indicating compliance with GDPR. However, no advanced security headers were detected, and no published security or incident response policies were found. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files. The absence of contact information for security incidents limits incident response readiness. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a public information site but could be improved by adding security headers, publishing policies, and providing vulnerability disclosure channels.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages.
  2. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy to improve transparency and incident response.
  4. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for general and security-related inquiries.
  5. Regularly review and update WHOIS information to ensure transparency and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Region Midtjylland
Description
Region Midtjylland er en offentlig organisation med hovedopgaverne sundhed og hospitaler, specialiserede tilbud til socialt udsatte og handicappede og at være politisk drivkraft for vækst gennem regional udvikling.
Key services
Healthcare and hospitals, Specialized social services for vulnerable and disabled groups, Political driver for regional growth and development
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
AngularJS, Cookiebot (cookie consent), Roboto and Midtsans fonts, CSS variables, Cludo search integration
Frameworks
AngularJS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with blocking mode enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cookiebot
Marketing tools
Cludo search
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is missing, which is uncommon for a government domain and may indicate privacy protection or data unavailability.
  3. Cookie consent is implemented with Cookiebot, indicating GDPR compliance efforts.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages were detected in the provided content.
  5. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses were found in the analyzed HTML snippet.
  6. Website uses AngularJS framework and modern CSS with custom fonts.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  8. No explicit security or incident response policies published on the main page.
  9. External scripts are limited to cookie consent and search functionality.
  10. No advertising networks or affiliate programs detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses AngularJS, a somewhat older but still functional JavaScript framework, combined with modern CSS variables and custom fonts (Roboto and Midtsans). Cookiebot is integrated for cookie consent management, and Cludo provides search functionality. The site appears mobile-optimized with responsive design. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected. No CMS or hosting provider information was found. The technical stack is stable but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rm.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rm.dk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.