Skip to main content

Security report for rlicorp.com

RLI · Finance · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

RLI is a specialty insurance company focusing on property and casualty insurance as well as surety bonds, targeting businesses, individuals, and families. The website presents a professional image with consistent branding and clear business focus on specialty insurance products. The technical infrastructure leverages modern web technologies including Webflow CMS, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar for analytics, and Intellimize for marketing optimization. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile devices but lacks comprehensive accessibility features. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS likely enabled but no visible security headers or explicit security policies. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, indicating compliance gaps. No contact information or incident response channels are provided, which limits user trust and security transparency. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced security, privacy compliance, and contact transparency to improve trustworthiness and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rlicorp.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
37
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

RLI operates in the specialty insurance sector, providing niche property and casualty insurance and surety bonds. The business model is focused on risk protection for a diverse audience including businesses and families. The company maintains an active social media presence on LinkedIn, Instagram, and YouTube, supporting brand visibility. The website content is targeted and relevant, supporting lead generation and customer engagement. The absence of WHOIS data and contact details suggests potential privacy protection or incomplete public information, which may affect perceived legitimacy. The use of advanced marketing tools indicates a focus on digital growth and customer acquisition. No direct partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS and includes several third-party scripts for analytics and marketing, which introduces potential security risks if not properly managed. No security headers were detected, and no explicit security or incident response policies are published. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. No forms or input fields were identified, reducing attack surface but also limiting user interaction. The absence of WHOIS data and registrant information reduces transparency and trust. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires improvements in policy transparency, security headers, and incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Provide clear contact information including security incident response channels and data protection officer contacts.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities and reduce tracking risks.
  5. Improve accessibility features and conduct security assessments to identify and remediate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
RLI
Description
RLI provides specialty property & casualty insurance and surety bonds that help protect businesses, individuals and families from life's uncertainties.
Key services
specialty property insurance, casualty insurance, surety bonds
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Intellimize, Font Awesome
Frameworks
Webflow
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Hotjar
Marketing tools
Intellimize
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. WHOIS data unavailable or domain not registered under www.rlicorp.com
  2. Website is professionally designed and uses modern web technologies
  3. No visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content
  5. Social media links present for LinkedIn, Instagram, and YouTube
  6. Uses multiple third-party tracking and marketing scripts
  7. No security headers detected in provided data
  8. No forms detected in the provided HTML snippet
  9. No security or incident response contact information found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Webflow CMS and uses modern JavaScript libraries and marketing tools including Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, and Intellimize. The hosting is via Webflow's CDN, providing reliable performance and scalability. The site is mobile optimized with good SEO metadata and structured data using JSON-LD for organization information. However, no CMS-specific security plugins or frameworks were detected. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. Accessibility is basic, and no advanced ARIA or accessibility features were found. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy compliance mechanisms.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rlicorp.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rlicorp.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.