Skip to main content

Security report for rkh.co.uk

Rock Kitchen Harris · Media · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Rock Kitchen Harris is a Leicester-based full-service creative agency established in 1982, offering a broad range of services including advertising, design, digital marketing, public relations, and strategic planning. The company positions itself as a fearless and original creative partner for brands, supported by a strong portfolio of case studies and notable clients. The website reflects a professional and modern digital presence with rich content and clear navigation, targeting businesses seeking comprehensive creative solutions. Technically, the site employs modern JavaScript libraries such as GSAP and Alpine.js, and integrates marketing and analytics tools like Google Tag Manager and LinkedIn Insight. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with a cookie consent mechanism in place, though explicit privacy and terms of service pages were not detected in the provided content. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but no visible security headers or incident response contacts. WHOIS data is unavailable due to domain naming rules violation, which introduces some trust concerns despite the professional appearance of the site.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rkh.co.uk

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
37
Security headers
40
Email security
75
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The agency operates in the media sector, serving a medium-sized business model focused on creative and marketing services. Its competitive advantage lies in its comprehensive service offering and long-standing client relationships, as evidenced by detailed case studies. The business model is service-oriented, targeting corporate clients needing brand strategy, advertising, and digital marketing. The company maintains an active social media presence across Instagram, Twitter, LinkedIn, and Facebook, enhancing its marketing reach. The lack of WHOIS transparency is a notable anomaly but does not directly impact the operational business intelligence derived from the website content.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is used, and cookie consent is implemented, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of visible security headers, security policies, and incident response contacts suggests gaps in security best practices and compliance readiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The lack of a security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy limits transparency for security researchers. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a marketing agency but could be improved to align with industry standards and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to enhance compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to improve security posture.
  3. Publish a security policy or incident response contact information to facilitate vulnerability reporting and incident management.
  4. Consider adding a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy to encourage responsible security research.
  5. Review domain registration details and ensure WHOIS information is accurate and publicly available to improve legitimacy and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Rock Kitchen Harris
Description
We’re a Leicester based full-service creative agency that brings original thinking and clear insights to your brand. Impeccable Vision, Fearless Creative.
Key services
Advertising, Design & Creative, Digital, Digital Marketing, Public Relations, Strategy & Planning
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
GSAP (GreenSock Animation Platform), Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Typekit Fonts, Alpine.js
Frameworks
Alpine.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by URL)
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
LinkedIn Insight, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
LinkedIn Insight
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional creative agency site with rich content and case studies
  2. No WHOIS data available due to domain naming rules violation error
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented and visible
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages detected in provided content
  5. Contact information includes company email and phone number in structured data
  6. Modern JavaScript libraries and tracking tools are used
  7. No signs of adult or questionable content
  8. No visible security policy or incident response contacts
  9. No security headers data available for analysis
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack including GSAP for animations, Alpine.js for reactive UI components, and integrates third-party analytics and marketing tools like Google Tag Manager and LinkedIn Insight. The site is well-structured with semantic HTML and responsive design, providing good accessibility and SEO optimization. Performance is moderate, with video backgrounds and rich media content that may impact load times but enhance user experience. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. Technical risks include the absence of visible security headers and incomplete WHOIS data, which could affect trust and security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rkh.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rkh.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.