Skip to main content

Security report for rk.com

Aylo Premium Ltd. · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.rk.com serves as a premium adult entertainment platform branded under Reality Kings, operated by Aylo Premium Ltd. It offers a vast library of high-definition adult videos across multiple niche categories and subsites, targeting adult consumers seeking subscription-based content. The site demonstrates a mature digital infrastructure with modern web technologies including React, Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise, and Flickity carousels, ensuring a responsive and engaging user experience. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforcement and bot protection, though explicit security headers are not clearly present. Privacy compliance is strong, featuring comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR considerations. However, the absence of WHOIS data for the domain www.rk.com introduces some uncertainty regarding domain registration legitimacy, though the brand and content quality strongly support business credibility. Overall, the site is professionally managed with robust content offerings and a clear business model centered on subscription and affiliate marketing.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rk.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
65
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Reality Kings is a well-established player in the adult entertainment industry with over two decades of content production and distribution. The business model relies on premium memberships, affiliate marketing, and partnerships with payment processors like Probiller and AdultForce. The target market is adult consumers globally, with a focus on high-quality, diverse adult content. The company maintains a consistent brand presence across multiple subsidiary sites and leverages extensive digital marketing and tracking technologies to optimize user engagement and revenue. The lack of direct contact information on the site is typical for this industry but may impact direct customer support visibility. The company’s strategic partnerships and comprehensive content library position it strongly in a competitive market.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and integrates Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise to mitigate automated abuse. Cookie consent mechanisms and privacy policies align with GDPR requirements, indicating a mature approach to privacy and data protection. However, the site lacks explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities. No obvious vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a minor concern but does not directly impact the website’s operational security. Incident response and security policy documentation are not publicly visible, suggesting an area for improvement in transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and explicitly publish security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen web security.
  2. Consider publishing a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher compliance standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking technologies to minimize security risks and privacy concerns.
  5. Investigate and clarify domain WHOIS registration details to improve business credibility and trust signals.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Aylo Premium Ltd.
Description
Reality Kings has over 20 years of experience delivering hardcore HD porn in every XXX category. The site offers content from over 45 sites including Dare Dorm, Money Talks, Moms Bang Teens, and more. It features amateurs and professional performers in various adult categories.
Key services
Premium adult video streaming, Membership access, Affiliate marketing
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise, Flickity carousel, Google Fonts (Montserrat, Droid Sans, Roboto), JavaScript ES6+, CDN usage for assets, Probiller payment integration
Frameworks
React
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of reCAPTCHA Enterprise for bot protection
  • Age verification disclaimers
  • Cookie consent mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
TrafficJunky
Tracking pixels
Google reCAPTCHA
Marketing tools
reCAPTCHA Enterprise
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a premium adult entertainment platform with extensive video content.
  2. No WHOIS data available for www.rk.com domain, indicating privacy protection or unregistered domain.
  3. Site uses HTTPS with modern security practices but lacks explicit security headers.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policies are comprehensive and GDPR compliant.
  5. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found on the site.
  6. Multiple external domains related to payment processing and affiliate marketing are linked.
  7. Site content is fully accessible with no WAF or blocking detected.
  8. Strong branding and consistent user experience.
  9. Extensive use of tracking and advertising technologies typical for adult content sites.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies, primarily React, with integration of Google Fonts and reCAPTCHA Enterprise for security. The use of Flickity provides smooth carousel functionality for content display. Assets are served via CDN, improving load times. The site is mobile responsive and optimized for desktop use. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement in load speed and accessibility compliance. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a high-quality user experience but could benefit from enhanced security header implementation and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rk.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rk.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.