Skip to main content

Security report for rivierarestorans.lv

SIA “SL Kitchen” · Hospitality · Latvia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Riviera Restaurant Riga is a small-sized hospitality business specializing in Mediterranean fine dining, offering a refined culinary experience with a focus on premium ingredients and an extensive wine list. The website reflects a strong market position in Riga's upscale dining sector, targeting discerning local and international guests. The business model includes dine-in services, seasonal menus, gift cards, and event bookings, supported by visible customer reviews and endorsements from local development agencies. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern JavaScript libraries such as Swiper.js and Yoast SEO for optimization. It demonstrates excellent mobile responsiveness, fast performance, and good accessibility features. Analytics are implemented via Google Analytics and SealMetrics, with a cookie consent mechanism ensuring privacy compliance. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data exposure, though the absence of explicit security headers and incident response contacts suggests room for improvement. The lack of WHOIS data due to query limits limits domain registration insights, but the website's professional presentation and consistent branding support its legitimacy. Overall, Riviera Restaurant Riga's digital presence is professional, secure, and privacy-aware, with recommendations to enhance security headers, incident response visibility, and formalize vulnerability disclosure policies to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rivierarestorans.lv

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
50
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Riviera Restaurant Riga operates in the hospitality sector, focusing on Mediterranean cuisine and fine dining experiences. Its competitive advantage lies in its premium ingredient sourcing, sophisticated wine selection, and elegant ambiance. The business targets affluent customers seeking quality dining in Riga, leveraging seasonal menus and event hosting to diversify revenue streams. Partnerships with local investment agencies indicate growth support and digitalization efforts. The website's strong SEO and social media presence enhance market reach, while customer reviews on Google and Tripadvisor reinforce reputation. Strategic observations suggest continued focus on digital marketing and compliance to maintain competitive positioning.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive information in the HTML content. Cookie consent mechanisms align with GDPR requirements, and analytics usage is transparent. However, the absence of key security headers (e.g., Content Security Policy, HSTS) and lack of visible incident response or security policy pages indicate gaps in comprehensive security governance. No vulnerabilities or malicious indicators were detected. The domain's privacy-protected WHOIS is typical for hospitality businesses but limits transparency. Overall, the security maturity is good but could benefit from enhanced header implementation and formalized security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen browser security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page with clear contact channels to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve trust.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins for vulnerabilities and update them promptly.
  5. Enhance privacy compliance by detailing data retention policies and user rights in the privacy policy.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA “SL Kitchen”
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA “SL Kitchen”
Description
Riviera in Riga offers refined Mediterranean dining with elegant dishes, premium wines, and warm hospitality. It celebrates Mediterranean sophistication with flavors from Italy, Spain, France, and Greece in an elegant setting. The restaurant focuses on premium ingredients, artful presentation, and a world-class wine list.
Key services
Mediterranean cuisine dining, Premium wine selection, Gift cards, Event and group bookings
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, Swiper.js, SealMetrics tracker, Google Analytics
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, SealMetrics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
SealMetrics
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented with strong branding and clear business focus.
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are implemented with consent mechanisms.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided with multiple channels.
  5. No security headers detected in HTML but HTTPS is enforced.
  6. No visible forms collecting personal data on the homepage.
  7. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and WordPress CMS.
  8. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram.
  9. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages found.
  10. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit; domain appears privacy protected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO plugin, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries like Swiper.js for interactive elements. It uses asynchronous loading for analytics scripts (Google Analytics and SealMetrics) to optimize performance. The site is well-structured with proper meta tags, canonical URLs, and JSON-LD structured data for SEO. Mobile optimization and accessibility are excellent, with responsive images and clear navigation. No hosting provider details were found, but the site uses HTTPS with valid certificates. Performance is fast with no broken elements detected. Technical risks include missing security headers and potential dependency on third-party scripts.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rivierarestorans.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rivierarestorans.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.