Skip to main content

Security report for riverwoods.net

River Woods · Retail · Belgium

Medium risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

River Woods operates as a European fashion retailer offering timeless apparel and accessories for women, men, and children. The website targets a broad audience with multi-language support and a clear e-commerce business model. The company appears to have a medium-sized market presence focused on retail fashion. Technically, the site is built on Magento, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries and analytics tools such as Google Analytics, Hotjar, and TikTok Pixel. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and professional design. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and reCAPTCHA integration, though security headers and explicit security policies are missing. Privacy compliance is partial, with a cookie consent mechanism but no visible privacy policy or terms of service pages. WHOIS data is unavailable, which reduces trustworthiness and suggests the need for domain registration verification. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching riverwoods.net

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
70
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
83
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

River Woods positions itself as a family-oriented fashion retailer with a focus on timeless classics and contemporary styles. The business model is primarily e-commerce retail with additional B2B services. The company targets customers in Belgium and neighboring countries, supporting multiple languages and localized stores. The use of Magento indicates a scalable platform suitable for medium-sized retail operations. The presence of outlet sections and seasonal collections suggests active inventory and marketing strategies. The lack of explicit company registration or contact details on the site limits direct business intelligence but the brand appears established in its niche. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the data.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enforced and integration of Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms. Cookie consent is implemented, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security is a gap. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information is present, which limits transparency for security researchers. The lack of visible incident response or security policies reduces confidence in the site's preparedness for security incidents. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be improved with additional headers and published policies.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages linked prominently on the website.
  2. Implement and configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Create and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve security transparency.
  4. Add explicit contact information including company emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility and user trust.
  5. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure domain legitimacy and reduce suspicion.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
River Woods
Description
River Woods provides timeless classics for women, men, girls and boys. Indispensable basics & contemporary fashion for the whole family.
Key services
Fashion apparel and accessories for women, men, and children, Online shopping, Outlet sales, B2B services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
RequireJS, jQuery, Magento, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Hotjar, TikTok Pixel, Magento ReCaptcha, Magento UI Components, Magento PageBuilder
Frameworks
Magento
Platforms
Magento e-commerce platform
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA integration
  • Cookie consent banner
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, TikTok Pixel
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
TikTok Pixel, Google Ads
Tracking pixels
TikTok Pixel, Hotjar
Marketing tools
Hotjar
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a Magento-based e-commerce platform for fashion retail.
  2. Multi-language and multi-country support present.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in main HTML content.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism implemented.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in HTML content.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable or domain not registered publicly.
  7. Good use of modern JavaScript libraries and tracking tools.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  9. No explicit security or incident response policies found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Magento e-commerce platform, utilizing RequireJS and jQuery for modular JavaScript loading and UI interactions. It integrates multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools including Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Hotjar, and TikTok Pixel. The site uses Magento PageBuilder for content management and dynamic page construction. The presence of Google reCAPTCHA enhances form security. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive images and CSS. Performance is moderate, with many JavaScript libraries loaded asynchronously. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is supported by meta tags and structured navigation. Hosting provider details are not evident from the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and suitable for a medium-sized retail e-commerce operation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with riverwoods.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review riverwoods.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.