Skip to main content

Security report for riverbelle.com

Baytree Interactive Ltd · Hospitality · Guernsey

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

River Belle Casino is a well-established online casino brand operating since 1997, offering a broad portfolio of casino games powered by the reputable Apricot software. The business targets global online casino players, providing desktop and mobile access with a strong focus on user experience, bonuses, and loyalty programs. The website demonstrates professional design, clear navigation, and mobile optimization, supporting a positive user experience. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and AngularJS, integrates Google Tag Manager and Site24x7 for analytics and monitoring, and supports multiple platforms including mobile devices. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though explicit security headers are not detected. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain introduces some uncertainty regarding domain registration legitimacy, but licensing by the Kahnawake Gaming Commission and eCogra certification provide strong trust signals. Overall, the site is credible and professionally maintained, though improvements in transparency of domain registration and security headers are recommended.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching riverbelle.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

River Belle Casino operates in the hospitality sector focusing on online gambling. It holds a medium market size with a long history dating back to 1997. The company, Baytree Interactive Ltd, is licensed in Guernsey and partners with Apricot for software and Buffalo Partners for affiliate marketing. The business model centers on providing a wide range of casino games, live dealer experiences, and attractive bonuses to retain and grow its player base. The target audience includes desktop and mobile users worldwide. The company maintains a professional online presence with clear trust indicators such as licensing and certifications. The affiliate ecosystem and multiple payment options support revenue diversification and customer convenience. Strategic partnerships with software providers and affiliate networks enhance market reach and operational capabilities.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and employs cookie consent banners aligned with GDPR requirements, indicating a mature privacy approach. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement in defense-in-depth strategies. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The absence of explicit incident response or security policy pages limits transparency in security governance. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from enhanced header policies and clearer incident response communication to improve resilience and trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to strengthen client-side security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and libraries to identify and mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user inclusivity.
  5. Clarify domain registration details or use WHOIS privacy protection with transparent justification to improve trustworthiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Baytree Interactive Ltd
Registration number
69691
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Baytree Interactive Ltd
Description
River Belle is an established online casino operating since 1997, offering a wide range of casino games powered by Apricot software, with extensive banking options and customer support.
Key services
Online casino games, Live dealer games, Casino bonuses and promotions, Mobile casino access, Customer support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.5.1, AngularJS, Google Tag Manager, Site24x7 Real User Monitoring, Apricot casino software
Frameworks
AngularJS
Platforms
Desktop, Mobile (iOS, Android, Blackberry, Windows)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with management options
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure cookies (SameSite=None; Secure)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), vtrk analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Site24x7
Tracking pixels
vtrk (src-play.com)
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. No WAF or blocking detected.
  3. WHOIS data is missing or domain not found in WHOIS registry.
  4. Strong licensing and certification trust signals present.
  5. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found on main site.
  6. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented and GDPR compliant.
  7. Use of modern analytics and tracking tools with user consent.
  8. Mobile optimized and supports multiple platforms.
  9. No explicit security headers detected in HTML source.
  10. No visible forms collecting personal data on main page.
Technical notes

Notes

The website leverages a modern technology stack including jQuery and AngularJS frameworks, supported by Google Tag Manager for analytics and Site24x7 for real user monitoring. The site is mobile-optimized and supports multiple platforms, ensuring broad accessibility. Performance is moderate with asynchronous script loading and polyfills for improved user experience. However, the absence of a detected CMS suggests a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details are not evident from the HTML content. Technical debt appears low, but the lack of explicit security headers and limited accessibility features indicate areas for modernization. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs effectively but could be enhanced with improved security and accessibility practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with riverbelle.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review riverbelle.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.