Skip to main content

Security report for rivals.game

Mythical Games · Media · United States

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

NFL Rivals is an arcade-style football game platform developed and operated by Mythical Games, targeting football fans and gamers interested in NFL-themed digital collectibles and competitive gameplay. The platform offers a free-to-play mobile game experience with integrated digital collectibles and a marketplace for trading NFL player cards. The website demonstrates a modern technical infrastructure leveraging React and Next.js frameworks, hosted on Cloudflare with integrations for video streaming, analytics, and marketing tools. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices and provides a professional user experience with clear branding and engaging content. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement and appropriate security headers, though there is a lack of explicit privacy and cookie policies, as well as missing terms of service and incident response information, which are important for compliance and user trust. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the business identity, supporting legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rivals.game

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
85
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Mythical Games positions NFL Rivals as a niche player in the sports arcade gaming market, leveraging official NFL branding and digital collectibles to attract a dedicated audience. The business model focuses on free-to-play gaming with monetization through digital asset sales and marketplace transactions. The platform's integration with related domains such as mythical.market and inventory.mythical.games indicates a robust ecosystem supporting player engagement and asset management. The target customer segment includes NFL fans, mobile gamers, and collectors of digital sports memorabilia. Growth potential is supported by multiplayer features and seasonal events. Strategic partnerships and consistent branding enhance market presence, though transparency in privacy and security policies could be improved to strengthen user confidence.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and a comprehensive set of security headers, reducing risks related to data interception and clickjacking. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of published security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms represents a compliance gap and potential risk in handling security incidents. The site uses third-party analytics and marketing scripts, which necessitate clear privacy disclosures and consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR and other regulations. Overall, the security measures in place are solid, but transparency and user communication regarding data protection and incident handling should be enhanced.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to ensure GDPR and privacy compliance.
  2. Add terms of service and clearly defined security incident response procedures accessible to users.
  3. Implement a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Provide explicit contact information including security and general support emails to improve trust and communication.
  5. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and integrations to minimize privacy risks and enhance security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Mythical Games
Description
Arcade-style football game where players dominate as the GM of their dream team, collecting and upgrading digital collectibles of NFL players.
Key services
Mobile football game, Digital collectibles marketplace, Multiplayer competitive gameplay
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Cloudflare Stream, Google Tag Manager, Optimizely, Hellobar, Google Fonts
Frameworks
React, Next.js
Platforms
Web, iOS, Android
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with input validation

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Optimizely
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Optimizely, Hellobar
Marketing tools
Optimizely, Hellobar
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally designed arcade-style NFL football game platform.
  2. Strong branding with official NFL partnership implied.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. Multiple external integrations for analytics and marketing.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on the homepage.
  6. No security incident response or vulnerability disclosure information present.
  7. Mobile optimized with fast performance and modern tech stack.
  8. No adult or questionable content detected.
  9. WHOIS data is transparent and consistent with business identity.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React and Next.js stack, leveraging Cloudflare for CDN and video streaming services. It uses Google Tag Manager, Optimizely, and Hellobar for analytics and marketing, indicating a mature digital marketing infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good accessibility features. Performance is fast with preloading and deferred script loading. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or headless approach. Hosting and infrastructure choices support scalability and security. Opportunities exist to improve technical documentation and compliance-related content to reduce technical debt and enhance user trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rivals.game. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rivals.game.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.