Skip to main content

Security report for rigatur.com

Рига Тур · Hospitality · Latvia

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in Email security, Network security and 3 other checks.

Security score

41/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Рига Тур is a small Latvian travel agency specializing in bus and ferry tours across the Baltic states, Russia, and Europe. Established since 1994, it offers a variety of group and individual tours, excursions, visa services, and travel arrangements. The website is well-structured with detailed tour listings, pricing, and dates, targeting tourists interested in regional travel. Technically, the site uses Bootstrap and jQuery with a CMS likely Netcat, hosted under a reputable registrar with stable DNS. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly but lacks advanced accessibility features. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS usage but missing DNSSEC and security headers. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site is trustworthy but could improve in security and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rigatur.com

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
35
Average
41

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a stable market position as a regional travel operator with a long history and consistent branding. Its business model focuses on packaged tours, visa facilitation, and travel services, catering mainly to Russian-speaking tourists. Partnerships with other travel-related sites indicate a collaborative ecosystem. Revenue streams likely come from tour bookings and visa services. The website content and structure support customer self-service with search modules and detailed offerings. Growth potential exists through digital marketing and enhanced compliance.

Security posture

The website demonstrates basic security hygiene with HTTPS and domain transfer protection. However, the lack of DNSSEC, security headers, and published security policies indicates room for improvement. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which may affect trust. The absence of privacy and cookie policies is a compliance risk under GDPR. No analytics or tracking scripts reduce privacy concerns but also limit marketing insights. Overall, the security posture is moderate but should be enhanced to meet modern standards.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security.
  3. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security contact information to improve incident response readiness.
  5. Consider integrating analytics with privacy-respecting configurations to improve marketing insights while maintaining user privacy.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
туристическая компания РигаТур
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Рига Тур
Description
Рига Тур предлагает комбинированные, паромные и автобусные туры по Прибалтике, России и Европе по доступным ценам из Риги, описание туров и цены смотрите на сайте.
Key services
Bus and ferry tours in Baltic states, Russia, Europe, Excursions and day trips, Visa processing services, Cruises, Travel insurance, Hotel and transport booking
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, Bootstrap CSS, jQuery 3.6.3, Google Fonts (Comfortaa), Schema.org JSON-LD
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage inferred from URL
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status to prevent unauthorized transfer

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Russian language.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with multiple phone numbers and email.
  4. No social media links detected.
  5. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  6. Website uses Bootstrap and jQuery for UI and interactivity.
  7. No security headers or explicit security policies found.
  8. Domain is old and consistent with business claims.
  9. No signs of adult or questionable content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional tech stack with Bootstrap and jQuery, ensuring responsive design and interactivity. The CMS appears to be Netcat, which is common in the region. Hosting is stable with a reputable registrar and regional DNS servers. Performance is moderate with no evident heavy scripts or trackers. SEO is supported by meta tags and structured data. Accessibility is basic and could be improved. The site lacks modern JavaScript frameworks or progressive web app features, indicating some technical debt and modernization opportunities.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rigatur.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rigatur.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.