Skip to main content

Security report for rigaluxapartments.com

Riga Lux Apartments · Hospitality · N/a

Medium risk. 1 critical or high finding in SSL/TLS.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Riga Lux Apartments operates as a hospitality business offering aparthotel accommodations near the city center of Riga. The website presents a professional and user-friendly interface with clear branding and relevant content targeting travelers seeking comfortable stays. The business model focuses on direct reservations for two fully equipped aparthotels, positioning itself as a local lodging provider. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including service workers for progressive web app capabilities, uses HTTPS for secure communication, and integrates third-party marketing and tracking tools such as Sojern and The Hotels Network. Privacy compliance is addressed through a cookie consent mechanism and a basic privacy policy page. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and trustworthiness. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rigaluxapartments.com

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
70
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets tourists and visitors to Riga, offering aparthotel-style accommodations as an alternative to traditional hotels. The business likely generates revenue through direct bookings facilitated on the website. The use of marketing tools and tracking pixels indicates an active digital marketing strategy aimed at customer acquisition and retargeting. The lack of detailed company information, contact details, or certifications limits the ability to fully assess business scale or partnerships. The domain registration uncertainty is a risk factor for business credibility. The company appears to be a small, local hospitality provider with a focused market niche.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, aligning with GDPR requirements. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is published, which limits transparency and preparedness. The use of multiple third-party scripts introduces potential privacy and security risks if not properly managed. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The security score is moderate but could be improved with additional controls and disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Verify and update domain registration details to ensure legitimacy and reduce trust concerns.
  4. Enhance contact information availability including company emails and phone numbers for customer and security communications.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks and ensure compliance with data protection regulations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Riga Lux Apartments
Description
Enjoy your stay in Riga! Two fully equiped aparthotels near city center. Find out more and make your reservation on Rigaluxapartments.com
Key services
aparthotel accommodation, reservations
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Cookiebot, FontAwesome, Source Sans Pro font, Be Vietnam font, Google Tag Manager (gtag.js), Sojern tracking, The Hotels Network
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • Service worker registered for PWA

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via gtag.js)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Sojern
Marketing tools
The Hotels Network
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security challenges
  2. Content is focused on aparthotel accommodations in Riga
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are implemented with consent mechanisms
  4. No explicit contact information or security policies published
  5. WHOIS data is missing, indicating possible domain registration issues
  6. Use of multiple third-party tracking and marketing scripts
  7. Good use of HTTPS and modern web technologies including service workers
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a CMS platform likely Multiscreensite, utilizing modern fonts and iconography (FontAwesome, Be Vietnam, Source Sans Pro). It uses JavaScript extensively for UI and tracking purposes, including service workers for offline capabilities. Performance is moderate with some optimization potential. Mobile responsiveness is good, and SEO meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD) are properly implemented. However, accessibility features are basic and could be enhanced. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional user experience but would benefit from improved security configurations and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rigaluxapartments.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rigaluxapartments.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.