Skip to main content

Security report for rigaapartment.com

RIGAAPARTMENT.COM · Hospitality · Latvia

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

RIGAAPARTMENT.COM operates a family-oriented aparthotel business in Riga, Latvia, offering modern self-contained apartments combined with hotel services such as private parking, airport transfers, and cleaning. The company targets families and budget-conscious travelers seeking convenient and independent accommodation in the city center. The website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including Bootstrap, Owl Carousel, and Google analytics tools, reflecting a moderate to good level of digital maturity. Security measures include HTTPS, Google reCAPTCHA on forms, and a cookie consent mechanism, though DNSSEC and security headers are absent, representing areas for improvement. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with GDPR, with clear contact information and customer reviews enhancing credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rigaapartment.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a mid-tier aparthotel provider with a focus on family travelers and value pricing. It leverages partnerships with booking platforms like Cloudbeds for reservations and offers a range of ancillary services including taxi booking, sightseeing tours, and spa treatments. The business model is direct accommodation rental with additional service offerings to enhance guest experience. The presence of multiple language options and social media channels indicates an international customer base. The domain age and WHOIS data support the legitimacy and stability of the business. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified, suggesting a standalone small business operation.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS enforced and use of Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms from abuse. Cookie consent is managed via a reputable third-party tool, indicating privacy awareness. However, the absence of DNSSEC and HTTP security headers reduces the overall security robustness. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, which is common for small hospitality businesses but represents a potential compliance gap. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Regular updates and security hardening are recommended to maintain and improve security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  2. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  3. Publish a basic security policy or incident response contact information to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to minimize vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and mobile optimization to improve user experience and compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
RIGAAPARTMENT.COM
Description
RIGAAPARTMENT SONADA, modern family apart hotel in combination with hotel services. Private parking, courtyard with children playground and loyal prices.
Key services
Self-contained apartments, Hotel services, Private parking, Children's playground, Airport transfer, Cleaning services, Taxi and car rental assistance, Sightseeing and event ticket assistance
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.4.5, jQuery, Bootstrap Datepicker, Owl Carousel, Slider Revolution, Google reCAPTCHA v2, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Yandex Metrika
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA on forms
  • Cookie consent banner with express consent
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for controlled script loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Yandex Metrika
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Yandex Metrika
Marketing tools
TermsFeed Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally maintained WordPress site for a family-oriented aparthotel in Riga.
  2. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms are implemented.
  3. Multiple customer reviews and social media presence enhance trust.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools is evident.
  5. Security practices are good but could be improved with DNSSEC and security headers.
  6. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.4.5 with a combination of popular JavaScript libraries and plugins including jQuery, Bootstrap Datepicker, Owl Carousel, and Slider Revolution. Google Tag Manager and Analytics are integrated for marketing and tracking purposes, alongside Yandex Metrika. The site uses Google reCAPTCHA v2 for form protection and TermsFeed for cookie consent management. Performance is moderate with minified CSS and JS assets cached. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified but the domain registrar is Domain.com, LLC. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and adequate for the business needs.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rigaapartment.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rigaapartment.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.