Skip to main content

Security report for ridgecapital.se

Ridge Capital · Finance · Sweden

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ridge Capital is a Swedish investment firm specializing in Nordic high yield corporate bonds, aiming to deliver equity-like returns with lower risk by investing alongside its clients. The company is relatively new, founded in 2022, and targets investors interested in the Nordic corporate bond market. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, with good content quality and clear business focus. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using the GeneratePress theme, enhanced with Yoast SEO and integrated HubSpot forms, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The presence of Cookiebot and Google Tag Manager shows attention to privacy and marketing analytics. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and no obvious vulnerabilities, though improvements such as enabling DNSSEC and adding security headers are recommended. Overall, the site is functional, compliant with GDPR, and presents a trustworthy business front, though it lacks explicit contact emails, phone numbers, and formal policies like terms of service or security policy pages.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ridgecapital.se

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Ridge Capital operates in the finance sector focusing on niche investment opportunities in Nordic corporate bonds. Its business model involves co-investing alongside clients, which may appeal to sophisticated investors seeking lower risk high yield returns. The company leverages partnerships with marketing and analytics providers like HubSpot and Google to support growth and client engagement. The domain age and WHOIS data align with the company's recent founding, supporting legitimacy. The absence of explicit contact details and formal policies suggests room for maturity in customer engagement and compliance documentation. The website's integration with multiple external services indicates a modern marketing approach but also increases the surface for privacy and security considerations.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS enforced and a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, the lack of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security robustness. The site uses several third-party scripts for analytics and marketing, which increases tracking and potential privacy risks but is managed via consent. Incident response and security policy information are absent, which could hinder transparency and readiness in case of security incidents. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be improved with standard best practices and documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to improve domain name system security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-XSS-Protection) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and preparedness.
  4. Add explicit contact emails and phone numbers for customer and security communications to enhance trust and accessibility.
  5. Create and publish terms of service and data protection officer contact details to strengthen compliance and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ridge Capital
Description
Ridge Capital invests alongside its investors in the Nordic corporate bond market seeking equity-like returns at lower risk by leveraging strategy, network, and knowledge.
Key services
Investment management, Corporate bond market opportunities
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, HubSpot forms, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, jQuery
Frameworks
GeneratePress theme
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent banner
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, HubSpot Analytics, Albacross
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Albacross
Tracking pixels
HubSpot Analytics, Cookiebot
Marketing tools
HubSpot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses WordPress with professional theme and SEO plugin
  2. Cookie consent implemented with Cookiebot, indicating GDPR awareness
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found; only contact form present
  4. No terms of service or security policy pages detected
  5. Multiple external analytics and marketing scripts loaded
  6. No DNSSEC enabled, which is a security improvement opportunity
  7. WHOIS data shows domain is active and registered with a reputable registrar
  8. No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using the GeneratePress theme, which is lightweight and SEO-friendly. It integrates Yoast SEO for metadata management and HubSpot for form handling and marketing automation. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing tags, alongside Cookiebot for cookie consent management. The site loads multiple external scripts from trusted domains, which may impact performance moderately but supports marketing and analytics needs. Mobile optimization is good, and SEO practices are well implemented with proper meta tags and structured data. However, accessibility features are basic and could be enhanced. Hosting is provided by Loopia AB, a reputable Swedish registrar and hosting provider. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from performance tuning and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ridgecapital.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ridgecapital.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.