Skip to main content

Security report for rics.org

Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors · Real Estate · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) is a globally recognized professional body specializing in land, real estate, construction, and infrastructure standards. Established in 1868 and headquartered in the United Kingdom, RICS provides accreditation, training, and professional standards to surveying professionals worldwide. The organization maintains a strong market position as a leader in real estate and surveying sectors, serving a broad audience of industry professionals. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including Bootstrap 5 and standard web security practices such as HTTPS enforcement and comprehensive security headers. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices and accessibility, providing a professional user experience with clear navigation and rich content. Privacy and cookie policies are clearly presented with consent mechanisms, reflecting good compliance with GDPR. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates a mature posture with no detected vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, it lacks a dedicated security policy or incident response page, which could enhance transparency and readiness. The WHOIS data is unavailable due to privacy protection, which is justified for an organization of this nature. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professionally maintained. The risk assessment is low with no critical issues detected. Strategic recommendations include publishing explicit security and incident response policies and considering a vulnerability disclosure program to further strengthen trust and security culture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rics.org

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

RICS operates as a large, essential entity in the real estate and surveying industry, providing professional accreditation and standards globally. Its business model revolves around membership services, training, and consultancy. The organization targets professionals in real estate, construction, and infrastructure sectors, leveraging its long history and ISO certification as competitive advantages. The website reflects a mature digital presence with integration of marketing and analytics tools. Partnerships and social media presence support its global outreach. Growth indicators include comprehensive service offerings and strong brand consistency.

Security posture

The website exhibits a strong security posture with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers implemented, including Content Security Policy and Strict-Transport-Security. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, the absence of a public security policy or incident response contact reduces transparency. There is no evidence of a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file. Data protection officer contact is provided, indicating GDPR awareness. Overall, security maturity is good but could be improved with formalized policies and disclosure mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Provide explicit incident response contact information and procedures on the website.
  3. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  4. Enhance transparency by detailing data retention and privacy compliance measures.
  5. Continue monitoring and updating security headers and SSL configurations regularly.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors
Description
RICS is a global professional body promoting and enforcing the highest international standards in the valuation, management and development of land, real estate, construction and infrastructure.
Key services
Professional accreditation, Standards and guidance, Training and education, Market research and insights, Consultancy services
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 5.1.3, JavaScript, CSS3, HTML5
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure cookies
  • Content Security Policy implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Content is rich, professional, and targeted to surveying and real estate professionals
  3. Strong privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms
  4. No security policy or incident response page explicitly found
  5. WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection
  6. Good security headers and HTTPS configuration
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and stable technology stack centered on Bootstrap 5 for responsive design and standard web technologies (HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript). Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. The site shows no signs of technical debt or deprecated technologies. SEO practices are well implemented with proper meta tags and structured data. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Opportunities exist to integrate CMS or advanced platforms for content management and scalability.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 75/100Medium27 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rics.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rics.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.