Skip to main content

Security report for reviewedporn.com

ReviewedPorn.com · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ReviewedPorn.com is a specialized adult media platform providing honest and detailed reviews of paid adult porn sites. Established in 2005, it holds a strong niche position by offering comprehensive content guides, discount deals, and categorized reviews to an adult-only audience. The website employs a custom-built technical infrastructure leveraging standard web technologies, Google Analytics, and Cloudflare DNS services. While the site is well-designed and user-friendly with good SEO and mobile optimization, it lacks advanced security headers and cookie consent mechanisms, which are important for privacy compliance. The domain registration is consistent and trustworthy, supporting the site's legitimacy. Overall, the platform serves its target market effectively but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching reviewedporn.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates primarily as an affiliate marketing and content review site within the adult entertainment sector. It targets adult consumers seeking reliable information on paid porn sites to optimize their spending and experience. The site leverages partnerships with discount and promotional platforms to enhance value propositions. Its long domain age and consistent branding provide competitive advantages. However, the absence of explicit business contact details and security policies may limit trust for some users. Growth opportunities exist in expanding privacy compliance and security transparency to align with evolving regulatory standards.

Security posture

The website maintains a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and domain status locks to prevent unauthorized changes. However, it lacks DNSSEC, security headers, and explicit incident response or security policies. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The use of third-party analytics introduces moderate user tracking without clear cookie consent, posing privacy compliance risks. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires improvements in headers, DNS security, and privacy mechanisms to reduce risk and enhance user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS integrity and security.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner and privacy controls to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  4. Publish clear security policies and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking to minimize privacy risks and improve user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ReviewedPorn.com
Description
ReviewedPorn.com provides honest and in-depth reviews of adult pay porn sites to help users avoid wasting time and money. The site offers detailed information about content updates, quality, costs, and cross sales of adult sites.
Key services
Porn site reviews, Discount and special deal listings, Categorized adult content guides
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, JavaScript, jQuery 1.8.3, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Cloudflare DNS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited and related EPP statuses

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a niche adult pay site review platform with extensive content and detailed reviews.
  2. No privacy or cookie consent banners detected despite GDPR relevance.
  3. No explicit security policies or incident response information found.
  4. Uses Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking.
  5. No DNSSEC enabled, which is a minor security gap.
  6. Domain is stable and well-maintained with multiple domain status locks.
  7. Content is fully accessible with no WAF blocking.
  8. Website design and navigation are professional and user-friendly.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a custom or unknown CMS with a technology stack including HTML5, JavaScript, jQuery 1.8.3, Google Analytics, and Google Tag Manager. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, providing CDN and DNS services. The site is moderately performant with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. However, the use of an older jQuery version may pose security risks and modernization opportunities exist. No CMS-specific frameworks or platforms were detected. The site lacks advanced accessibility features and security headers, indicating technical debt in security implementation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with reviewedporn.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review reviewedporn.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.